ST1.5 board support and some ST1.0/1.5 common changes.

ST1.5 board support and some ST1.0/1.5 common changes.

    Following features working/verified on ST1.5:
        - Boot from external SD

    New in this patch:
        - ST1.5 support
        - new MMC framework   (enabled)
        - DCC console support (default is "serial")

    Fixes:
        - ATAGs to kernel
        - SDCC stack corruption fix

    Not working/tested on ST1.5:
        - Boot from eMMC
        - Serial
        - USB
        - LCD
        - KBD
        - I2C
        - NAND support
        - Any other thing not mentioned in working/verified section.

[amoljadi, 2010-03-25 02:38:00]

To build u-boot for ST1.5, this change also needs to go in:
 http://codereview.chromium.org/1231002

Plus we also need to update the load/entry address that is set in the
vmlinux.uimg.

[amoljadi, 2010-03-25 20:44:18]

I am breaking this into multiple issues for easier review. I will cancel this
review.

[robotboy, 2010-03-25 21:09:29]

Thank you, thank you.  :)

-Anton

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM, <amoljadi@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> I am breaking this into multiple issues for easier review. I will cancel
> this
> review.
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/1329001
>

[amoljadi, 2010-03-25 21:25:39]

No problem. Should have done that in the first place J

 

BTW, Do I need to Publish+Mail commets after I create the issue? Or just
adding the reviewers by doing "edit issue" will send out email? Apologies if
you are flooded with these multiple emails.

 

-Amol

 

From: robotboy@google.com [mailto:robotboy@google.com] On Behalf Of Anton
Staaf
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:09 PM
To: amoljadi@codeaurora.org; robotboy@chromium.org; micahc@chromium.org;
medwards@codeaurora.org; bdaugher@codeaurora.org; pgargey@codeaurora.org;
cros.approvers@codeaurora.org; chromium-os-reviews@chromium.org
Subject: Re: ST1.5 board support and some ST1.0/1.5 common changes.
(issue1329001)

 

Thank you, thank you.  :)

 

-Anton

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM, <amoljadi@codeaurora.org> wrote:

I am breaking this into multiple issues for easier review. I will cancel
this
review.



http://codereview.chromium.org/1329001