Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(67)

Issue 6778007: gooftool: always process EC before BIOS (workaround for buggy EC) (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 8 months ago by Hung-Te
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Nick Sanders, Louis
CC:
chromium-os-reviews_chromium.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

gooftool: always process EC before BIOS (workaround for buggy EC) EC on some platform is still buggy. If we leave BBS selector to LPC, rebooting command will fail. User will end in frozen with "Rebooting" message. As a workaround, we should always process EC before BIOS. BUG=chrome-os-partner:854 TEST=gooftool --finalize --db_path DBPATH --upload_method none flashrom -V | grep Found # the output is SPI(BIOS), not LPC(EC). reboot # success on Z* Change-Id: I3f09b6e0f4a3017801b26b9c7dfa0bf1cc5050d2 R=yjlou@chromium.org,nsanders@chromium.org Committed: http://chrome-svn/viewvc/chromeos?view=rev&revision=c4f91cb

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 3

Patch Set 2 : improve wpfw command #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+9 lines, -4 lines) Patch
M gft_report.py View 1 chunk +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M gft_wpfw.py View 1 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gooftool View 2 chunks +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
Hung-Te
9 years, 8 months ago (2011-03-30 09:02:37 UTC) #1
Louis
http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool File gooftool (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool#newcode315 gooftool:315: if EnableWriteProtect('ec') and EnableWriteProtect('bios'): hm... a risk here: if ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2011-03-30 09:28:59 UTC) #2
Hung-Te
http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool File gooftool (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool#newcode315 gooftool:315: if EnableWriteProtect('ec') and EnableWriteProtect('bios'): That's what we want - ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2011-03-30 09:40:09 UTC) #3
Nick Sanders
lgtm http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool File gooftool (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool#newcode315 gooftool:315: if EnableWriteProtect('ec') and EnableWriteProtect('bios'): Probably just as well ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2011-03-30 09:40:43 UTC) #4
Louis
9 years, 8 months ago (2011-03-30 09:46:05 UTC) #5
Okay. LGTM.
On 2011/03/30 09:28:59, Louis wrote:
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool
> File gooftool (right):
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6778007/diff/1/gooftool#newcode315
> gooftool:315: if EnableWriteProtect('ec') and EnableWriteProtect('bios'):
> hm... a risk here: if EnableWriteProtect('ec') is false, then
> EnableWriteProtect('bios') will not be executed.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698