|
|
DescriptionFix tautological comparison and add clang flag
Committed: https://crrev.com/1b142eb67aedcd40f07234e38174b5b0f9995dc5
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#439346}
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 3
Patch Set 2 : Remove warnings from openh264 #Patch Set 3 : Remove clang warnings only when using clang #
Messages
Total messages: 39 (24 generated)
altimin@chromium.org changed reviewers: + brettw@chromium.org, tzik@chromium.org
PTAL
build owners lgtm, but please check with Michael before checking in. https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/diff/1/storage/browser/quota/quota... File storage/browser/quota/quota_manager.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/diff/1/storage/browser/quota/quota... storage/browser/quota/quota_manager.cc:89: return type == kStorageTypeTemporary || type == kStorageTypePersistent; Can you check with the original author, michaeln, about the changes to this file? For this line in particular, I wouldn't have expected persistent storage to be allowed in incognito.
altimin@chromium.org changed reviewers: + michaeln@chromium.org
michaeln@, could you PTAL? https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/diff/1/storage/browser/quota/quota... File storage/browser/quota/quota_manager.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/diff/1/storage/browser/quota/quota... storage/browser/quota/quota_manager.cc:89: return type == kStorageTypeTemporary || type == kStorageTypePersistent; On 2016/12/15 18:49:31, brettw (ping after 24h) wrote: > Can you check with the original author, michaeln, about the changes to this > file? For this line in particular, I wouldn't have expected persistent storage > to be allowed in incognito. Sure, moved him from cc to reviewers.
The CQ bit was checked by altimin@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_chromium_chromeos_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/diff/1/storage/browser/quota/quota... File storage/browser/quota/quota_manager.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/diff/1/storage/browser/quota/quota... storage/browser/quota/quota_manager.cc:89: return type == kStorageTypeTemporary || type == kStorageTypePersistent; On 2016/12/15 18:57:08, altimin wrote: > On 2016/12/15 18:49:31, brettw (ping after 24h) wrote: > > Can you check with the original author, michaeln, about the changes to this > > file? For this line in particular, I wouldn't have expected persistent storage > > to be allowed in incognito. > > Sure, moved him from cc to reviewers. lgtm thnx, ok, yikes, i'll add some tests with kQuotaErrorNotSupported expectations
> I wouldn't have expected persistent storage > to be allowed in incognito. is is so incognito is not (as) detectable
brettw@, there were failures in openh264, I disabled warnings for that third-party library. Could you please sanity-check this?
The CQ bit was checked by altimin@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)
lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by altimin@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_chromium_asan_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...) linux_chromium_chromeos_ozone_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...) linux_chromium_chromeos_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...) linux_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
The CQ bit was checked by altimin@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from michaeln@chromium.org, brettw@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002/#ps30001 (title: "Remove clang warnings only when using clang")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_chromium_asan_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...) linux_chromium_chromeos_ozone_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...) linux_chromium_chromeos_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...) linux_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
The CQ bit was checked by altimin@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
The CQ bit was checked by altimin@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
CQ is committing da patch. Bot data: {"patchset_id": 30001, "attempt_start_ts": 1481984586754510, "parent_rev": "18af521d307143cb692fb56772054f1c3f628b88", "commit_rev": "09ba49867c0c97dc5a32b37c72b97a204ff51166"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Fix tautological comparison and add clang flag ========== to ========== Fix tautological comparison and add clang flag Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002 ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #3 (id:30001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Fix tautological comparison and add clang flag Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2581733002 ========== to ========== Fix tautological comparison and add clang flag Committed: https://crrev.com/1b142eb67aedcd40f07234e38174b5b0f9995dc5 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#439346} ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 3 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/1b142eb67aedcd40f07234e38174b5b0f9995dc5 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#439346}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
jsbell@chromium.org changed reviewers: + jsbell@chromium.org
Message was sent while issue was closed.
FYI: pending reversion for the base CL at https://codereview.chromium.org/2592793002 That'll remove the tautological statement; we'll need to make sure this fix gets reapplied when it relands although the clang flag should catch it. |