Using fullstop Unicode if horizontal ellipsis not present

LayoutTests/third_party/AndroidEmojiMonospace/README.chromium

Index: LayoutTests/third_party/AndroidEmojiMonospace/README.chromium
diff --git a/LayoutTests/third_party/AndroidEmojiMonospace/README.chromium b/LayoutTests/third_party/AndroidEmojiMonospace/README.chromium
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25dfe5307834cfdf4849a6fb28534da3f5e894fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LayoutTests/third_party/AndroidEmojiMonospace/README.chromium
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Android Emoji Monospace Font:
+
+1. Source Origin
+The Android Open Source Project:
+    a) https://github.com/android/platform_frameworks_base/tree/jb-release/data/fonts
+
+2. LICENSE AND OPENSOURCE
+	For license information, see the LICENSE.txt file
+
+3. Reason:
+Font file included as a real-world example for testing monosoace font which does not support Latin script
+for LayoutTests/fast/text/ellipsis-platform-font-change.html test case
+
+Command to generate subset font:
+$ python pyftsubset.py AndroidEmoji.ttf --unicodes=U+203C

[Dominik Röttsches, 2014/12/15 09:37:41]

I can't follow here. Can you explain why are you adding this font? You are
reducing the font to U+203C "DOUBLE EXCLAMATION MARK", but I do not see that
codepoint used anywhere. Typo "monosoace".

[h.joshi, 2014/12/24 06:30:59]

This font and test was made for old patch
(https://codereview.chromium.org/680213004).
In which was trying to test Monochrome font for which "widthFromCache" is called
and 
we were calculating width using wrong font.

 Later that patch was split into two for better handling of patch, I was busy
with OTS patch
thus did not got time to update font and test case, that was the reason I did
not raised patch 
review request.

Now new font and new test case is made.

+
+where pyftsubset comes from https://github.com/behdad/fonttools
+