Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(140)

Issue 459633002: Autosizing storage doesnot belong on FrameView (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 4 months ago by Shanmuga Pandi
Modified:
6 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers:
pdr., ostap, eseidel
CC:
blink-reviews, atreat, gnana
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Project:
blink
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Autosizing storage doesnot belong on FrameView Removing AutoSize storage from Frameview and create seperate struct to handle autoSize BUG=401254 Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=180663

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Removed deadcode #

Total comments: 8

Patch Set 3 : Added new files #

Patch Set 4 : Rebased #

Total comments: 12

Patch Set 5 : Aligned with review comments #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+218 lines, -144 lines) Patch
M Source/core/core.gypi View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M Source/core/frame/FrameView.h View 1 2 3 4 4 chunks +4 lines, -12 lines 0 comments Download
M Source/core/frame/FrameView.cpp View 1 2 3 4 5 chunks +8 lines, -130 lines 0 comments Download
A Source/core/frame/FrameViewAutoSizeInfo.h View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +43 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A Source/core/frame/FrameViewAutoSizeInfo.cpp View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +157 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M Source/web/WebLocalFrameImpl.cpp View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M Source/web/WebViewImpl.cpp View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +4 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 19 (0 generated)
Shanmuga Pandi
Please review the changes.
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-09 12:39:18 UTC) #1
ostap
https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h File Source/core/frame/FrameView.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h#newcode60 Source/core/frame/FrameView.h:60: struct FrameViewAutoSizeData { Shouldn't it go into separate .h ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-10 05:01:51 UTC) #2
Shanmuga Pandi
https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h File Source/core/frame/FrameView.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h#newcode60 Source/core/frame/FrameView.h:60: struct FrameViewAutoSizeData { On 2014/08/10 05:01:51, ostap wrote: > ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-10 09:56:48 UTC) #3
Shanmuga Pandi
Please have a look on these changes. https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h File Source/core/frame/FrameView.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h#newcode60 Source/core/frame/FrameView.h:60: struct FrameViewAutoSizeData ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-11 08:58:00 UTC) #4
ostap
https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h File Source/core/frame/FrameView.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/459633002/diff/20001/Source/core/frame/FrameView.h#newcode60 Source/core/frame/FrameView.h:60: struct FrameViewAutoSizeData { On 2014/08/10 09:56:48, Shanmuga Pandi wrote: ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-11 19:24:27 UTC) #5
ostap
On 2014/08/11 08:58:00, Shanmuga Pandi wrote: > Please have a look on these changes. I ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-11 19:27:23 UTC) #6
Shanmuga Pandi
pdr@chromium.org: Please review the changes.
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-12 05:09:21 UTC) #7
pdr.
I think this looks good. +cc eseidel
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-12 05:19:15 UTC) #8
Shanmuga Pandi
Rebased the code, due to trybot failure. Please add trybot again.
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-12 08:32:40 UTC) #9
Shanmuga Pandi
@esidel Gentle ping!!
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-13 04:25:21 UTC) #10
eseidel
I think this is no worse than what we have now. But we definitely could ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-19 16:31:18 UTC) #11
eseidel
In any case, I think we should land this as-is and consider a second patch ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-19 16:35:00 UTC) #12
Shanmuga Pandi
On 2014/08/19 16:35:00, eseidel wrote: > In any case, I think we should land this ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 07:38:09 UTC) #13
Shanmuga Pandi
@eseidel Thanks for reviewing the patch. I have uploaded new patch based on your comments. ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 14:54:13 UTC) #14
eseidel
The CQ bit was checked by eseidel@chromium.org
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 16:03:33 UTC) #15
eseidel
lgtm
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 16:03:33 UTC) #16
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/shanmuga.m@samsung.com/459633002/80001
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 16:03:54 UTC) #17
commit-bot: I haz the power
FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1). The failing builders are: win_blink_rel on tryserver.blink ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 17:03:27 UTC) #18
commit-bot: I haz the power
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-08-20 17:38:22 UTC) #19
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #5 (80001) as 180663

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698