[LayoutNG] Change anonymous LayoutBlockFlow to LayoutNGBlockFlow

[LayoutNG] Change anonymous LayoutBlockFlow to LayoutNGBlockFlow

Additionally this resolves an incoming margin strut once we know the inline node
isn't empty. In this respect we treat it like a zero-height div.

This regresses some tests that were using the existing LayoutBlockFlow layout.
I.e. when we are inside a LayoutTableCell.

BUG=635619
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2851983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#468470}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/dc843fac8da1a46453dd6035c910c07f5237922c

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 17:23:48]

The CQ bit was checked by ikilpatrick@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 17:24:18]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 17:51:33]

Description was changed from

==========
[LayoutNG] Margins through empty inlines.

BUG=
==========

to

==========
[LayoutNG] Change anonymous LayoutBlockFlow to LayoutNGBlockFlow

Additionally this resolves an incoming margin strut once we know the inline node
isn't empty. In this respect we treat it like a zero-height div.

This regresses some tests that were using the existing LayoutBlockFlow layout.
I.e. when we are inside a LayoutTableCell.

BUG=635619
==========

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 17:51:44]

ikilpatrick@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ glebl@chromium.org

[Gleb Lanbin, 2017-05-01 17:55:47]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 18:27:33]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 18:27:34]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 18:33:37]

The CQ bit was checked by ikilpatrick@chromium.org

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 18:33:38]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from glebl@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2851983002/#ps40001
(title: "fix test expectations.")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 18:34:30]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 18:46:40]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 18:46:41]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  chromium_presubmit on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/chromium_presub...)

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 18:47:01]

ikilpatrick@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ eae@chromium.org

[ikilpatrick, 2017-05-01 18:47:01]

+eae for core/layout :)

[eae, 2017-05-01 18:49:26]

LGTM

[eae, 2017-05-01 18:49:31]

The CQ bit was checked by eae@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 18:50:05]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 22:58:01]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 40001, "attempt_start_ts": 1493664571365380,
"parent_rev": "9815502de37719154e0e2f2bc8ad4caa7b5561fd", "commit_rev":
"dc843fac8da1a46453dd6035c910c07f5237922c"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 22:58:15]

Description was changed from

==========
[LayoutNG] Change anonymous LayoutBlockFlow to LayoutNGBlockFlow

Additionally this resolves an incoming margin strut once we know the inline node
isn't empty. In this respect we treat it like a zero-height div.

This regresses some tests that were using the existing LayoutBlockFlow layout.
I.e. when we are inside a LayoutTableCell.

BUG=635619
==========

to

==========
[LayoutNG] Change anonymous LayoutBlockFlow to LayoutNGBlockFlow

Additionally this resolves an incoming margin strut once we know the inline node
isn't empty. In this respect we treat it like a zero-height div.

This regresses some tests that were using the existing LayoutBlockFlow layout.
I.e. when we are inside a LayoutTableCell.

BUG=635619

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2851983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#468470}
Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/dc843fac8da1a46453dd6035c910...
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-01 22:58:16]

Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/dc843fac8da1a46453dd6035c910...