|
|
DescriptionFilter extra output introduced by updating proguard
This CL filters encoded binary protobuf signaled by "***BINARY RUN
STATS***" and program class information signaled by "ProgramClass:".
This extra output is introduced by updating proguard.
BUG=674152
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#462620}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/749473a927734754dfcb323b16bdf747b7248d5a
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 2
Patch Set 2 : Address comments #Patch Set 3 : Address comments #Messages
Total messages: 31 (20 generated)
Description was changed from ========== Filter RunStatsWriter output in proguard output BUG=674152 ========== to ========== Filter RunStatsWriter output in proguard output RunStatsWriter in Proguard always prints "***BINARY RUN STATS***: " followed by the encoded binary protobuf. This CL filters this output so it does not clog the build log. BUG=674152 ==========
The CQ bit was checked by zpeng@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
zpeng@chromium.org changed reviewers: + agrieve@chromium.org
Hi Andrew, PTAL. Thanks!
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
lgtm https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002/diff/1/build/android/gyp/util/prog... File build/android/gyp/util/proguard_util.py (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002/diff/1/build/android/gyp/util/prog... build/android/gyp/util/proguard_util.py:22: self._to_ignore_next_line = False nit: _to_ignore_next_line -> _ignore_next_line
Thanks Andrew! PTAL submitting soon https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002/diff/1/build/android/gyp/util/prog... File build/android/gyp/util/proguard_util.py (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002/diff/1/build/android/gyp/util/prog... build/android/gyp/util/proguard_util.py:22: self._to_ignore_next_line = False On 2017/04/04 20:05:51, agrieve wrote: > nit: _to_ignore_next_line -> _ignore_next_line Done.
The CQ bit was checked by zpeng@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from agrieve@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002/#ps20001 (title: "Address comments")
jbudorick@chromium.org changed reviewers: + jbudorick@chromium.org
There are a bunch of other lines that show up in the build log as well, not just the binary protobuf lines. Should we filter those as well?
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)
Description was changed from ========== Filter RunStatsWriter output in proguard output RunStatsWriter in Proguard always prints "***BINARY RUN STATS***: " followed by the encoded binary protobuf. This CL filters this output so it does not clog the build log. BUG=674152 ========== to ========== Filter extra output introduced by updating proguard This CL filters encoded binary protobuf signaled by "***BINARY RUN STATS***" and program class information signaled by "ProgramClass:". This extra output is introduced by updating proguard. BUG=674152 ==========
The CQ bit was checked by zpeng@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Thanks Andrew & John! PTAL This CL now also filters "ProgramClass" output. At the moment, the only output is "Printing mapping to". I think that's useful to keep around. WDUT?
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: ios-simulator on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-simulator/bui...)
The CQ bit was checked by zpeng@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
On 2017/04/06 15:00:22, F wrote: > Thanks Andrew & John! PTAL > > This CL now also filters "ProgramClass" output. At the moment, the only output > is "Printing mapping to". I think that's useful to keep around. WDUT? I'd probably silence that as well, but don't really care at all. Probably not worth spending any more time on. lgtm
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
The CQ bit was checked by zpeng@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
CQ is committing da patch. Bot data: {"patchset_id": 40001, "attempt_start_ts": 1491508620882420, "parent_rev": "991302e9a650020672202c472a3998a4afdfede2", "commit_rev": "749473a927734754dfcb323b16bdf747b7248d5a"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Filter extra output introduced by updating proguard This CL filters encoded binary protobuf signaled by "***BINARY RUN STATS***" and program class information signaled by "ProgramClass:". This extra output is introduced by updating proguard. BUG=674152 ========== to ========== Filter extra output introduced by updating proguard This CL filters encoded binary protobuf signaled by "***BINARY RUN STATS***" and program class information signaled by "ProgramClass:". This extra output is introduced by updating proguard. BUG=674152 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2801443002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#462620} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/749473a927734754dfcb323b16bd... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/749473a927734754dfcb323b16bd...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2017/04/06 15:58:47, agrieve wrote: > On 2017/04/06 15:00:22, F wrote: > > Thanks Andrew & John! PTAL > > > > This CL now also filters "ProgramClass" output. At the moment, the only output > > is "Printing mapping to". I think that's useful to keep around. WDUT? > > I'd probably silence that as well, but don't really care at all. Probably not > worth spending any more time on. lgtm I'd lean silence but we can address that later as necessary. |