|
|
Description(Really) disable gdb-index for LTO.
This is a follow up to https://codereview.chromium.org/2782483002,
where only official LTO builds had got gdb-index disabled.
BUG=660216
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2786603003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#460421}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/95e4983f85e5afb97b37df59b5666b2f3d2949a1
Patch Set 1 #
Messages
Total messages: 15 (5 generated)
krasin@chromium.org changed reviewers: + scottmg@chromium.org
thakis@chromium.org changed reviewers: + thakis@chromium.org
Lgtm. Is there a bug to make this work with LTO? Why doesn't it just work?
The CQ bit was checked by thakis@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
On 2017/03/29 15:31:55, Nico wrote: > Lgtm. Is there a bug to make this work with LTO? No idea, really. Is there a bug to enable gdb-index in all configurations? As gdb-index is a new development (at least, for Chrome), and LTO has been for a while, I would just reuse the gdb-index bug. > Why doesn't it just work? No idea, again. I have never used gdb-index before, and don't have any intuition here. Asking Peter (pcc@) might help.
On 2017/03/29 15:35:28, krasin1 wrote: > On 2017/03/29 15:31:55, Nico wrote: > > Lgtm. Is there a bug to make this work with LTO? > No idea, really. Is there a bug to enable gdb-index in all configurations? As > gdb-index is a new development (at least, for Chrome), It's not that new. We had it on by default 2 years ago, but had to disable it cause some tooling didn't work well with it (notably, gdb dislikes fission + gdb-index). So it was behind a flag for a while. I tried turning it on by default, but it looks like tools are still sad. > and LTO has been for a > while, I would just reuse the gdb-index bug. > > > Why doesn't it just work? > No idea, again. I have never used gdb-index before, and don't have any intuition > here. Asking Peter (pcc@) might help.
Thank you for adding more context. Interesting. I will file a bug; not promising that I will work on it, but at least I will try to understand what's wrong with it.
On 2017/03/29 16:07:25, krasin1 wrote: > Thank you for adding more context. Interesting. > I will file a bug; not promising that I will work on it, but at least I will try > to understand what's wrong with it. Filed https://crbug.com/706429
CQ is committing da patch. Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1490801552962920, "parent_rev": "a3fa213abee042db7dd7523582f982c2dd72b056", "commit_rev": "95e4983f85e5afb97b37df59b5666b2f3d2949a1"}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== (Really) disable gdb-index for LTO. This is a follow up to https://codereview.chromium.org/2782483002, where only official LTO builds had got gdb-index disabled. BUG=660216 ========== to ========== (Really) disable gdb-index for LTO. This is a follow up to https://codereview.chromium.org/2782483002, where only official LTO builds had got gdb-index disabled. BUG=660216 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2786603003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#460421} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/95e4983f85e5afb97b37df59b566... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/95e4983f85e5afb97b37df59b566...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2017/03/29 16:38:30, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote: > Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/95e4983f85e5afb97b37df59b566... I suspect this breaks Linux ARM64 Debug builds (uncovered by Chromium bots). I filed https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=708104 for that.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2017/04/04 08:30:02, kjellander_chromium wrote: > On 2017/03/29 16:38:30, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote: > > Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as > > > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/95e4983f85e5afb97b37df59b566... > > I suspect this breaks Linux ARM64 Debug builds (uncovered by Chromium bots). > I filed https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=708104 for that. Since this CL disables gdb-index in some configurations, not enables it, are you sure it's the right CL to blame? Did you mean https://codereview.chromium.org/2770933009/ where it got enabled? |