Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/Editor.cpp | 
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/Editor.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/Editor.cpp | 
| index 147b10fa09c203c7d4978f25893ff29ef469de4d..6011a271e56e41e680b1c6717d3fc6655e6a4142 100644 | 
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/Editor.cpp | 
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/editing/Editor.cpp | 
| @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ Editor::RevealSelectionScope::~RevealSelectionScope() { | 
| // TODO(yosin): We should make |Editor::selectionForCommand()| to return | 
| // |SelectionInDOMTree| instead of |VisibleSelection|. | 
| VisibleSelection Editor::selectionForCommand(Event* event) { | 
| - frame().selection().updateIfNeeded(); | 
| 
 
Xiaocheng
2017/02/24 18:06:06
Is this a mis-removal?
 
yosin_UTC9
2017/02/25 01:02:03
Yes, good catch!
This is over removal. I should mo
 
 | 
| VisibleSelection selection = | 
| frame().selection().computeVisibleSelectionInDOMTreeDeprecated(); | 
| if (!event) | 
| @@ -926,9 +925,7 @@ static VisibleSelection correctedVisibleSelection( | 
| !passedSelection.extent().isConnected()) | 
| return VisibleSelection(); | 
| DCHECK(!passedSelection.base().document()->needsLayoutTreeUpdate()); | 
| - VisibleSelection correctedSelection = passedSelection; | 
| - correctedSelection.updateIfNeeded(); | 
| - return correctedSelection; | 
| + return createVisibleSelection(passedSelection.asSelection()); | 
| } | 
| void Editor::unappliedEditing(UndoStep* cmd) { |