[NTP] Rephrase the comment in components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS.

[NTP] Rephrase the comment in components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS.

Rephrase the comment from "backup OWNERS" to "ordinary OWNERS for
inside-team CLs".

BUG=None

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#447971}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/6fb1a6ff9319dbf7e9dd8d165f675ed398160db2

[vitaliii, 2017-02-02 14:23:05]

The CQ bit was checked by vitaliii@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-02 14:23:13]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[vitaliii, 2017-02-02 14:23:28]

vitaliii@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ treib@chromium.org

[vitaliii, 2017-02-02 14:23:28]

[small change]

Hi treib@,

PTAL.

[Marc Treib, 2017-02-02 14:27:31]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003/diff/1/components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS
File components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003/diff/1/components/ntp_snippets/OWN...
components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS:5: # Unsure who to ask? Choose from the above.
nitty nit: It's kinda weird that this comment is attached to this block, but
really concerns the above one. Not sure how to formulate it better though.

[vitaliii, 2017-02-02 14:30:47]

vitaliii@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ sfiera@chromium.org

[vitaliii, 2017-02-02 14:30:47]

Hi sfiera@,

Do you know a better way to achieve what I am trying to do? :)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-02 14:41:05]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-02 14:41:06]

Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.

[sfiera, 2017-02-02 14:41:07]

https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003/diff/1/components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS
File components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003/diff/1/components/ntp_snippets/OWN...
components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS:5: # Unsure who to ask? Choose from the above.
On 2017/02/02 14:27:31, Marc Treib wrote:
> nitty nit: It's kinda weird that this comment is attached to this block, but
> really concerns the above one. Not sure how to formulate it better though.

I think that `git cl owners` will show you a comment that's after the username
it suggests. So, I think a more useful way of formatting the file would be:

bauerb@chromium.org    # primary owner
vitaliii@chromium.org  # secondary owner, primary for offline
noyau@chromium.org     # ios owner

so that someone that runs the command will have a good idea whether to accept
the suggestion or hold out for another.

[vitaliii, 2017-02-03 08:59:04]

I answered sfiera@ comment, no need to look.

https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003/diff/1/components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS
File components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003/diff/1/components/ntp_snippets/OWN...
components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS:5: # Unsure who to ask? Choose from the above.
On 2017/02/02 14:41:07, sfiera wrote:
> On 2017/02/02 14:27:31, Marc Treib wrote:
> > nitty nit: It's kinda weird that this comment is attached to this block, but
> > really concerns the above one. Not sure how to formulate it better though.
> 
> I think that `git cl owners` will show you a comment that's after the username
> it suggests. So, I think a more useful way of formatting the file would be:
> 
> mailto:bauerb@chromium.org    # primary owner
> mailto:vitaliii@chromium.org  # secondary owner, primary for offline
> mailto:noyau@chromium.org     # ios owner
> 
> so that someone that runs the command will have a good idea whether to accept
> the suggestion or hold out for another.

I see your point. However, previously we had no end line comments for a very
long time and I do not recall getting random CLs to review. Thus, I assume that
suggested usage is rather unlikely. Let's try as it is in this CL and if we
start getting random CLs, then move to your approach.

[vitaliii, 2017-02-03 08:59:15]

The CQ bit was checked by vitaliii@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-03 08:59:29]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-03 09:31:35]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1486112355198710, "parent_rev":
"202f1212a29d67d81515dfa55f31b0ec8501efb3", "commit_rev":
"6fb1a6ff9319dbf7e9dd8d165f675ed398160db2"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-03 09:32:36]

Description was changed from

==========
[NTP] Rephrase the comment in components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS.

Rephrase the comment from "backup OWNERS" to "ordinary OWNERS for
inside-team CLs".

BUG=None
==========

to

==========
[NTP] Rephrase the comment in components/ntp_snippets/OWNERS.

Rephrase the comment from "backup OWNERS" to "ordinary OWNERS for
inside-team CLs".

BUG=None

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#447971}
Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/6fb1a6ff9319dbf7e9dd8d165f67...
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-02-03 09:32:38]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/6fb1a6ff9319dbf7e9dd8d165f67...