Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(169)

Issue 2668783002: Added histograms for Custom Feedback UI (Closed)

Created:
3 years, 10 months ago by JJ
Modified:
3 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
Mark P
CC:
chromium-reviews, asvitkine+watch_chromium.org
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Added histograms for Custom Feedback UI Custom feedback was added to the internal build due to First Party APIs. However, there is very little reason to keep what we track off of a public commit. As a result, the logs are kept here instead. BUG=676476 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#447815} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c0dfdbfdb6f8c3c5b2dd463691ef7b00508d5b5e

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 7

Patch Set 2 : Fixed based of mpearson's comments #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 3 : Clarified first option by deleting fluff #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+57 lines, -0 lines) Patch
M tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml View 1 2 2 chunks +57 lines, -0 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 23 (13 generated)
JJ
Hello Mark, I'm currently working on Custom Feedback UI for Chrome. Right now this involves ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-01-31 23:17:30 UTC) #5
Mark P
On 2017/01/31 23:17:30, JJ wrote: > Hello Mark, > > I'm currently working on Custom ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-01 19:53:53 UTC) #8
JJ
So in relation to the internal cl, here it is (just about to upload the ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-01 20:16:56 UTC) #9
Mark P
https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/20001/tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml File tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/20001/tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml#newcode454 tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml:454: + This is recorded regardless if the user submits ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 00:28:39 UTC) #10
JJ
Alright fixed the previous comments. Hopefully it looks better now. https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/20001/tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml File tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/20001/tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml#newcode454 ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 01:02:05 UTC) #11
Mark P
possible lgtm with caveat below https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/40001/tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml File tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/40001/tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml#newcode463 tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml:463: + Custom Feedback UI. ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 05:07:50 UTC) #12
JJ
On 2017/02/02 05:07:50, Mark P (away thru Feb 5 2017) wrote: > possible lgtm with ...
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 16:35:45 UTC) #13
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/40001
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 19:12:06 UTC) #19
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c0dfdbfdb6f8c3c5b2dd463691ef7b00508d5b5e
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 19:19:35 UTC) #22
JJ
3 years, 10 months ago (2017-02-02 19:21:48 UTC) #23
Message was sent while issue was closed.
(Pressed the wrong button, wanted to make sure you knew I did reply to the
comment)

https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/40001/tools/metrics/histogram...
File tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2668783002/diff/40001/tools/metrics/histogram...
tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml:463: +    Custom Feedback UI.
On 2017/02/02 05:07:50, Mark P (away thru Feb 5 2017) wrote:
> Is it possible they select an option without selecting a category first?
> If not, then this lgtm.
> If so, then what do you end up emitting here?

It is not possible to select an option without selecting a category.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698