Condition SecKeyAlgorithm (re)declaration on min, not max version.

Condition SecKeyAlgorithm (re)declaration on min, not max version.

We not only need to declare it prior to the 10.12 SDK due to the typedef
being missing but, because of -Wpartial-availability, we need to
redeclare it even on the 10.12 SDK until the minimum version is 10.12 or
later.

BUG=none

Committed: https://crrev.com/d16880639bed5b1ce61aa78e11ec3530b5a7e815
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#438577}

[davidben, 2016-12-14 13:05:41]

The CQ bit was checked by davidben@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 13:05:55]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[davidben, 2016-12-14 13:06:07]

davidben@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ erikchen@chromium.org

[davidben, 2016-12-14 13:06:08]

Does this look right? See https://codereview.chromium.org/2566273008/#msg20

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 13:55:36]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 13:55:37]

Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.

[erikchen, 2016-12-14 18:54:36]

lgtm

[davidben, 2016-12-14 19:08:42]

The CQ bit was checked by davidben@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 19:09:17]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 19:15:54]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1481742522271330, "parent_rev":
"91f4e62fc3452d89ee5bd4b7462b8caf96d26d59", "commit_rev":
"3a0d4c26efcf6c74b019930e11f010b6c4f85368"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 19:16:19]

Description was changed from

==========
Condition SecKeyAlgorithm (re)declaration on min, not max version.

We not only need to declare it prior to the 10.12 SDK due to the typedef
being missing but, because of -Wpartial-availability, we need to
redeclare it even on the 10.12 SDK until the minimum version is 10.12 or
later.

BUG=none
==========

to

==========
Condition SecKeyAlgorithm (re)declaration on min, not max version.

We not only need to declare it prior to the 10.12 SDK due to the typedef
being missing but, because of -Wpartial-availability, we need to
redeclare it even on the 10.12 SDK until the minimum version is 10.12 or
later.

BUG=none

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2572113002
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 19:16:20]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 19:19:49]

Description was changed from

==========
Condition SecKeyAlgorithm (re)declaration on min, not max version.

We not only need to declare it prior to the 10.12 SDK due to the typedef
being missing but, because of -Wpartial-availability, we need to
redeclare it even on the 10.12 SDK until the minimum version is 10.12 or
later.

BUG=none

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2572113002
==========

to

==========
Condition SecKeyAlgorithm (re)declaration on min, not max version.

We not only need to declare it prior to the 10.12 SDK due to the typedef
being missing but, because of -Wpartial-availability, we need to
redeclare it even on the 10.12 SDK until the minimum version is 10.12 or
later.

BUG=none

Committed: https://crrev.com/d16880639bed5b1ce61aa78e11ec3530b5a7e815
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#438577}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-14 19:19:50]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/d16880639bed5b1ce61aa78e11ec3530b5a7e815
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#438577}