Revert of [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX.

Revert of [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1966183003/ )

Reason for revert:
Blocks roll: https://codereview.chromium.org/1972303002/

Original issue's description:
> [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX.
>
> V8 tracing controller uses 2 clocks: wall clock and cpu clock. This patch
> implements CPU time for OS X and POSIX to provide more accurate
> accounting of CPU time used by each thread.
>
> BUG=v8:4984
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/efa27fb25e1fa5b8465f4af710086b73b0cba660
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36213}

TBR=fmeawad@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,rsesek@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,lpy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4984
Committed: https://crrev.com/31b9ba3bc8fb93601cc73c83213b30e639d448b3
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36225}

[Michael Hablich, 2016-05-13 07:07:59]

Created Revert of [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-13 07:08:05]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1977753002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1977753002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-13 07:08:18]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-13 07:10:05]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX. (patchset #1 id:1 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/1966183003/ )

Reason for revert:
Blocks roll: https://codereview.chromium.org/1972303002/

Original issue's description:
> [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX.
> 
> V8 tracing controller uses 2 clocks: wall clock and cpu clock. This patch
> implements CPU time for OS X and POSIX to provide more accurate
> accounting of CPU time used by each thread.
> 
> BUG=v8:4984
> LOG=n
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/efa27fb25e1fa5b8465f4af710086b73b0cba660
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36213}

TBR=fmeawad@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,rsesek@chromium.org,bmeurer@chro...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4984
==========

to

==========
Revert of [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX. (patchset #1 id:1 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/1966183003/ )

Reason for revert:
Blocks roll: https://codereview.chromium.org/1972303002/

Original issue's description:
> [Reland] Implement CPU time for OS X and POSIX.
>
> V8 tracing controller uses 2 clocks: wall clock and cpu clock. This patch
> implements CPU time for OS X and POSIX to provide more accurate
> accounting of CPU time used by each thread.
>
> BUG=v8:4984
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/efa27fb25e1fa5b8465f4af710086b73b0cba660
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36213}

TBR=fmeawad@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,rsesek@chromium.org,bmeurer@chro...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4984

Committed: https://crrev.com/31b9ba3bc8fb93601cc73c83213b30e639d448b3
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36225}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-05-13 07:10:05]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/31b9ba3bc8fb93601cc73c83213b30e639d448b3
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36225}

[lpy, 2016-05-13 07:13:36]

May I ask the reason please? The reason saying 'blocks roll' doesn't provide
enough information to me.

[jochen (gone - plz use gerrit), 2016-05-13 07:14:33]

On 2016/05/13 at 07:13:36, lpy wrote:
> May I ask the reason please? The reason saying 'blocks roll' doesn't provide
enough information to me.

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium...

[lpy, 2016-05-13 07:18:09]

On 2016/05/13 07:14:33, jochen (OOO) wrote:
> On 2016/05/13 at 07:13:36, lpy wrote:
> > May I ask the reason please? The reason saying 'blocks roll' doesn't provide
> enough information to me.
> 
>
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium...

Thanks.
But it seems to that the failure was not caused by the ThreadTicks, is that
right?

[Michael Hablich, 2016-05-13 11:05:13]

A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1976603005/ by hablich@chromium.org.

The reason for reverting is: Not the culprit sorry..