Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
TBR=shuchen@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/7dad4b118fe1debab178df8df629bde20b5233fa
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#384581}

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 10:28:29]

Description was changed from

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
==========

to

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
==========

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 10:44:02]

Description was changed from

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
==========

to

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
==========

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 10:44:03]

toyoshim@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ jochen@chromium.org

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 11:03:07]

toyoshim@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ shuchen@chromium.org

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 11:10:29]

toyoshim@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ torne@chromium.org

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 11:11:30]

toyoshim@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ palmer@chromium.org

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 11:14:18]

toyoshim@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ isherman@chromium.org

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 11:15:09]

The CQ bit was checked by toyoshim@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-31 11:15:20]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1846653004/20001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1846653004/20001

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-03-31 11:26:24]

Can you review this cleanup change?
Backgrounds are explained in the BUG, and two more changes for blink are under
reviews as https://codereview.chromium.org/1843663005/ and
https://codereview.chromium.org/1846733004/.

Shu: As I commented below, can you check if my renaming change is safe for
ChromeOS?

Torne: Can you take a look for android_webview?

Ilya: actions.xml. I don't add me as a metrics owner because I just add a
renamed version of existing one. But original owner hasn't been assigned around
here. What's expected change here?

Palmer: For content/common/frame_message_enums.h. I only change a enum entry
name.

Jochen: For other files. Sorry for bothering you. But I want you to review this
and other two changes that I already sent separately.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/chrome/browser/resource...
File chrome/browser/resources/chromeos/keyboard_overlay_data.js (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/chrome/browser/resource...
chrome/browser/resources/chromeos/keyboard_overlay_data.js:15885:
'r<>CTRL<>SHIFT': 'keyboardOverlayReloadBypassingCache',
shuchen: I'm a bit afraid that this could affect user's stored settings. Is this
safe to rename?

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/chrome/browser/ui/webui...
File chrome/browser/ui/webui/chromeos/keyboard_overlay_ui.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/chrome/browser/ui/webui...
chrome/browser/ui/webui/chromeos/keyboard_overlay_ui.cc:224: {
"keyboardOverlayReloadBypassingCache",
shuchen: same. I don't understand how these strong works.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-31 11:32:04]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-31 11:32:05]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  android_compile_dbg on tryserver.chromium.android (JOB_FAILED,
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.android/builders/android_comp...)

[Torne, 2016-03-31 11:35:34]

android_webview LGTM

[jochen (gone - plz use gerrit), 2016-03-31 15:29:22]

lgtm

[Ilya Sherman, 2016-03-31 15:33:55]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/tools/metrics/actions/a...
File tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/tools/metrics/actions/a...
tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml:11761: <description>Please enter the
description of this user action.</description>
Can you please update these while you're updating this metric?

[palmer, 2016-03-31 22:34:23]

rubberstamp lgtm

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-04-01 05:53:07]

Ilya: Fixed in PS3.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/tools/metrics/actions/a...
File tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/20001/tools/metrics/actions/a...
tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml:11761: <description>Please enter the
description of this user action.</description>
On 2016/03/31 15:33:55, Ilya Sherman wrote:
> Can you please update these while you're updating this metric?

Done.

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-04-01 05:54:03]

Description was changed from

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
==========

to

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
TBR=shuchen@chromium.org
==========

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-04-01 06:00:25]

The CQ bit was checked by toyoshim@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 06:01:10]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1846653004/60001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1846653004/60001

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-04-01 06:02:23]

I talked with local ChromeOS member, and he said this ChromeOS change looks
safe. So, I may submit this with TBR=shuchen.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 06:32:59]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 06:33:01]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  android_arm64_dbg_recipe on tryserver.chromium.android (JOB_FAILED,
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.android/builders/android_arm6...)
  linux_android_rel_ng on tryserver.chromium.android (JOB_FAILED,
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.android/builders/linux_androi...)

[Ilya Sherman, 2016-04-01 06:40:21]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/60001/tools/metrics/actions/a...
File tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/diff/60001/tools/metrics/actions/a...
tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml:11761: <description>The user triggers Super
Reload operation.</description>
"Super Reload" is not very clear (at least, not to me).  Could you please expand
this explanation a bit?  Otherwise LGTM -- thanks.

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-04-01 12:28:32]

The CQ bit was checked by toyoshim@chromium.org

[Takashi Toyoshima, 2016-04-01 12:28:33]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from palmer@chromium.org,
jochen@chromium.org, torne@chromium.org, isherman@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1846653004/#ps120001
(title: "rebase")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 12:28:41]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1846653004/120001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1846653004/120001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 14:28:14]

Description was changed from

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
TBR=shuchen@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
TBR=shuchen@chromium.org
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 14:28:16]

Committed patchset #7 (id:120001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 14:29:14]

Description was changed from

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
TBR=shuchen@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
Rename IGNORING_CACHE to BYPASSING_CACHE

chrome and content uses IGNORE_CACHE to specify a strong reload.
But, Blink uses ReloadBypassingCache instead of ReloadIgnoringCacheData.

This is confusing and we should use consistent words in the project.

This series of changes remove 'ignore' or 'ignoring' from the code base
completely, and use 'validate' and 'bypass' to be consistent with
net flags.

BUG=599364
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation
TBR=shuchen@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/7dad4b118fe1debab178df8df629bde20b5233fa
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#384581}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-01 14:29:16]

Patchset 7 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/7dad4b118fe1debab178df8df629bde20b5233fa
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#384581}