Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(260)

Issue 163703004: Revert 250823 "With --site-per-process, avoid a crash when a sub..." (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 10 months ago by Alexei Svitkine (slow)
Modified:
6 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
Charlie Reis
CC:
chromium-reviews
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Revert 250823 "With --site-per-process, avoid a crash when a sub..." Speculative revert to see if the navigation changes here are causing sync_integration_tests to fail on: http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.win/builders/Win7%20Sync%20x64/builds/11217 > With --site-per-process, avoid a crash when a subframe process goes away. > > We need to clear out the children of any nodes that are affected by the > crash, not the entire FrameTree. > > BUG=338508 > TEST=Killing an iframe process with --site-per-process shows a green rectangle. > R=ajwong@chromium.org, nasko@chromium.org > > Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/156303004 TBR=creis@chromium.org Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=251090

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+11 lines, -98 lines) Patch
M trunk/src/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree.h View 2 chunks +1 line, -10 lines 0 comments Download
M trunk/src/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree.cc View 2 chunks +1 line, -20 lines 0 comments Download
M trunk/src/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_node.h View 1 chunk +3 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M trunk/src/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_node.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M trunk/src/content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.cc View 1 chunk +4 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M trunk/src/content/browser/site_per_process_browsertest.cc View 1 chunk +0 lines, -62 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
Alexei Svitkine (slow)
6 years, 10 months ago (2014-02-13 18:34:54 UTC) #1
Alexei Svitkine (slow)
Committed patchset #1 manually as r251090 (tree was closed).
6 years, 10 months ago (2014-02-13 18:35:07 UTC) #2
Charlie Reis
Why was this CL suspected in the sync failure? I don't yet see a connection.
6 years, 10 months ago (2014-02-13 18:52:30 UTC) #3
Alexei Svitkine (slow)
None of the other more obvious CLs seem to have helped, looking at things that ...
6 years, 10 months ago (2014-02-13 19:00:48 UTC) #4
Charlie Reis
6 years, 10 months ago (2014-02-13 19:01:33 UTC) #5
Ok, thanks.


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Alexei Svitkine
<asvitkine@chromium.org>wrote:

> None of the other more obvious CLs seem to have helped, looking at things
> that may impact navigation.
>
> But right now, it doesn't look like this was the cause. I will revert the
> revert once things are well.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:52 PM, <creis@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Why was this CL suspected in the sync failure?  I don't yet see a
>> connection.
>>
>> https://codereview.chromium.org/163703004/
>>
>
>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698