Clean up histogram'd media enum max values.

media/audio/sample_rates.cc

Index: media/audio/sample_rates.cc
diff --git a/media/audio/sample_rates.cc b/media/audio/sample_rates.cc
index a082a938ab8ad7d5739bb16146d85f8e674bd2d0..99e522527022f0afdd9b78813012ef07549e790d 100644
--- a/media/audio/sample_rates.cc
+++ b/media/audio/sample_rates.cc
@@ -4,23 +4,37 @@
 
 #include "media/audio/sample_rates.h"
 
+#include "base/logging.h"
+
 namespace media {
 
-AudioSampleRate AsAudioSampleRate(int sample_rate) {
+bool ToAudioSampleRate(int sample_rate, AudioSampleRate* asr) {
+  DCHECK(asr);
   switch (sample_rate) {
-    case 8000: return k8000Hz;
-    case 16000: return k16000Hz;
-    case 32000: return k32000Hz;
-    case 48000: return k48000Hz;
-    case 96000: return k96000Hz;
-    case 11025: return k11025Hz;
-    case 22050: return k22050Hz;
-    case 44100: return k44100Hz;
-    case 88200: return k88200Hz;
-    case 176400: return k176400Hz;
-    case 192000: return k192000Hz;
+    case 8000: *asr = k8000Hz;
+      return true;

[Ami GONE FROM CHROMIUM, 2014/02/12 20:26:48]

Is clang-format pleased with this?  
(having a statement follow the label on the same line, and then another on the
next line)

+    case 16000: *asr = k16000Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 32000: *asr = k32000Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 48000: *asr = k48000Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 96000: *asr = k96000Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 11025: *asr = k11025Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 22050: *asr = k22050Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 44100: *asr = k44100Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 88200: *asr = k88200Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 176400: *asr = k176400Hz;
+      return true;
+    case 192000: *asr = k192000Hz;
+      return true;
   }
-  return kUnexpectedAudioSampleRate;
+  return false;
 }
 
 }  // namespace media