Index: build/sanitizers/lsan_suppressions.cc |
diff --git a/build/sanitizers/lsan_suppressions.cc b/build/sanitizers/lsan_suppressions.cc |
index d1c9d22cac3850eb94ecd77b2c45c3268dcce3c5..84b44532fdfe522628dc6971d2f3a69404500e33 100644 |
--- a/build/sanitizers/lsan_suppressions.cc |
+++ b/build/sanitizers/lsan_suppressions.cc |
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ char kLSanDefaultSuppressions[] = |
// Leaks in swrast_dri.so. http://crbug.com/540042 |
"leak:swrast_dri.so\n" |
+// Leaks in GtkFileChooserDialog. http://crbug.com/537468 |
+"leak:libglib-2.0\n" |
msw
2015/10/16 17:01:03
I wonder if this is too wide of a suppression. Wou
joone
2015/10/16 23:33:46
How about adding interactive_ui_tests to the suppr
|
+ |
// ================ Leaks in Chromium code ================ |
// PLEASE DO NOT ADD SUPPRESSIONS FOR NEW LEAKS. |
// Instead, commits that introduce memory leaks should be reverted. Suppressing |