Revert of Precompile more in Blink in Windows for faster compilations

Revert of Precompile more in Blink in Windows for faster compilations (patchset #9 id:160001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1167523007/)

Reason for revert:
Strange errors in http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Builder indicating that old versions of headers are used by the compiler. Possibly a stale cached pch file.

Original issue's description:
> Precompile more in Blink in Windows for faster compilations
> 
> One reason Blink is slow to compile is that there is a lot of code
> included in every compilation unit since everything depends on either
> LayoutObject.h or Document.h and those in turn include huge portions
> of the rest of Blink.
> 
> By precompiling LayoutObject.h and Document.h the compilation of core and
> modules in Blink can be 4 times faster (4 minutes instead of
> 19 minutes on my computer).
> 
> The downside is that it will introduce Document.h and LayoutObject.h
> also in compilation units that didn't expect it, for instance
> XPathGrammer.y that suddenly will have both blink::Path and
> blink::XPath::Path in scope (and blink::Filter / blink::XPath::Filter)
> 
> Note that distributed compilation system disables precompiled headers
> globally so this will *not* make trybots faster.
> 
> BUG=495697
> R=thakis@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=198859

TBR=brucedawson@chromium.org,jam@chromium.org,scottmg@chromium.org,thakis@chromium.org,sigbjornf@opera.com,tasak@google.com,haraken@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=495697
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=199036

[Daniel Bratell, 2015-07-16 15:23:16]

Created Revert of Precompile more in Blink in Windows for faster compilations

[Daniel Bratell, 2015-07-16 15:28:06]

The CQ bit was checked by bratell@opera.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-16 15:28:32]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1234393002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-16 15:28:35]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-16 15:28:36]

No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[Nico, 2015-07-16 15:34:25]

The CQ bit was checked by thakis@chromium.org

[Nico, 2015-07-16 15:34:25]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-16 15:35:04]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1234393002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-16 15:35:57]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=199036

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-16 15:35:58]

philipj@opera.com changed reviewers:
+ philipj@opera.com

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-16 15:35:58]

lgtm

Removed these bits so that it'll go through CQ and not break everything more:
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true

[philipj_slow, 2015-07-16 15:36:25]

On 2015/07/16 15:35:58, philipj wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> Removed these bits so that it'll go through CQ and not break everything more:
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true

Oops, mid-air collition, that was too late. Let's hope it worked out :)

[sof, 2015-07-16 16:59:39]

The reverted CL was Blink r19859.

Builds [43921, 43963] seems to have built fine with it --

 
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Builder?numbuild...

[sof, 2015-07-16 17:00:17]

On 2015/07/16 16:59:39, sof wrote:
> The reverted CL was Blink r19859.
> 
> Builds [43921, 43963] seems to have built fine with it --
> 
>  
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Builder?numbuild...

Not quite that old; s/r19859/r198859/

[Daniel Bratell, 2015-07-17 14:04:03]

A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1227953008/ by bratell@opera.com.

The reason for reverting is: Again.