Initial contents for the new factory_test repo

Create the factory test upstart jobs.

The initial job contents were taken from
mod_for_factory_scripts/200patchInitScript, in the
src/scripts repository.

BUG=chromium-os:13258
TEST=Build and boot a factory test image

Committed: http://chrome-svn/viewvc/chromeos?view=rev&revision=9143fab

[jrbarnette, 2011-03-17 22:34:43]

This change is one of a set of four CLs that move selected bits of
code from mod_image_for_test into an ebuild.

The complete list of CLs (in order of the push operations)
  1) Initial contents for the new factory_test repo:
     http://codereview.chromium.org/6667059/
  2) Update the manifest file to include the new factory_test repo:
     http://codereview.chromium.org/6709010/
  3) Add an ebuild for the new factorytest-init package:
     http://codereview.chromium.org/6665047/
  4) Update mod_image_for_test to use the new factorytest-init package:
     http://codereview.chromium.org/6665048/

[Nick Sanders, 2011-03-17 22:55:13]

can you as a inherit codereview as well.

With that, LGTM.

[Vince Laviano, 2011-03-17 22:59:23]

LGTM, with a comment about the copyright notice.

http://codereview.chromium.org/6667059/diff/2001/LICENSE
File LICENSE (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6667059/diff/2001/LICENSE#newcode1
LICENSE:1: // Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors. All rights reserved.
I'm not a lawyer, but should this (and the copyright notice in the other files)
be "2010-2011" or "2010, 2011" to reflect that the original code that you're
transplanting from the mod_for_factory_scripts dir existed prior to 2011?

[jrbarnette, 2011-03-17 23:40:04]

On 2011/03/17 22:55:13, Nick Sanders wrote:
> can you as a inherit codereview as well.
> 
> With that, LGTM.

(per an offline conversation):  inherit-review-settings-ok is
already present in the repository.  LICENSE also pre-existed; it's
only changing to update the copyright date.

[jrbarnette, 2011-03-17 23:43:11]

On 2011/03/17 22:59:23, Vince Laviano wrote:
> LGTM, with a comment about the copyright notice.
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6667059/diff/2001/LICENSE
> File LICENSE (right):
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6667059/diff/2001/LICENSE#newcode1
> LICENSE:1: // Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors. All rights reserved.
> I'm not a lawyer, but should this (and the copyright notice in the other
files)
> be "2010-2011" or "2010, 2011" to reflect that the original code that you're
> transplanting from the mod_for_factory_scripts dir existed prior to 2011?

For the LICENSE file the content was created in 2011, so that's what it should
say.

For the other content, I think it's a matter of corporate policy.  My
understanding
from other places I've worked is that legally, there's no need to mention older
dates.