Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(140)

Issue 231024: Disable the json_schema_unittest since it crashes after a WebKit deps roll.... (Closed)

Created:
11 years, 3 months ago by jorlow
Modified:
9 years, 6 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews_googlegroups.com, jam, pam+watch_chromium.org, Paweł Hajdan Jr., darin (slow to review), brettw, tim (not reviewing)
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Disable the json_schema_unittest since it crashes after a WebKit deps roll. TBR=nsylvain TEST=Unit tests now work. BUG=22971 Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=27144

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+14 lines, -12 lines) Patch
M chrome/renderer/extensions/json_schema_unittest.cc View 1 1 chunk +14 lines, -12 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
jorlow
11 years, 3 months ago (2009-09-24 23:06:00 UTC) #1
Erik does not do reviews
http://codereview.chromium.org/231024/diff/3/1002 File chrome/renderer/extensions/json_schema_unittest.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/231024/diff/3/1002#newcode52 Line 52: #if 0 drive-by: why use #if 0 if ...
11 years, 3 months ago (2009-09-24 23:10:00 UTC) #2
jorlow
http://codereview.chromium.org/231024/diff/3/1002 File chrome/renderer/extensions/json_schema_unittest.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/231024/diff/3/1002#newcode52 Line 52: #if 0 On 2009/09/24 23:10:00, Erik Kay wrote: ...
11 years, 3 months ago (2009-09-24 23:11:55 UTC) #3
Erik does not do reviews
11 years, 3 months ago (2009-09-24 23:21:08 UTC) #4
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM,  <jorlow@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/231024/diff/3/1002
> File chrome/renderer/extensions/json_schema_unittest.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/231024/diff/3/1002#newcode52
> Line 52: #if 0
> On 2009/09/24 23:10:00, Erik Kay wrote:
>>
>> drive-by: why use #if 0 if you added DISABLED_ to all of the tests
>
> anyway? =A0when
>>
>> you do this, it means it will be hard for us to use automated tools to
>
> notice
>>
>> when tests are disabled.
>
> The #if 0 was necessary because it crashed (not just failed). =A0The
> DISABLED_'s are not. =A0I tried the DISABLED_'s first to double check and
> it didn't work. =A0Now that I think about it, I should probably change
> back all the DISABLED_'s.

I don't understand.  DISABLED tests aren't run, so why would they crash?

Erik

>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/231024
>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698