Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(45)

Issue 15035: Refactored the code for handling debug step in in the runtime system into one... (Closed)

Created:
12 years ago by Søren Thygesen Gjesse
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Refactored the code for handling debug step in in the runtime system into one function. For constructors this also means that step in will no longer step into the code for the builtins context. Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=1001

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+39 lines, -21 lines) Patch
M src/debug.h View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/debug.cc View 1 1 chunk +27 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/ic.cc View 1 chunk +5 lines, -11 lines 0 comments Download
M src/runtime.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -9 lines 0 comments Download
M test/mjsunit/debug-stepin-constructor.js View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Søren Thygesen Gjesse
12 years ago (2008-12-18 13:50:18 UTC) #1
Mads Ager (chromium)
LGTM! http://codereview.chromium.org/15035/diff/1/6 File src/debug.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/15035/diff/1/6#newcode1117 Line 1117: if (function->context()->global() != This condition will fit ...
12 years ago (2008-12-18 14:27:26 UTC) #2
Søren Thygesen Gjesse
12 years ago (2008-12-18 14:34:07 UTC) #3
http://codereview.chromium.org/15035/diff/1/6
File src/debug.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/15035/diff/1/6#newcode1117
Line 1117: if (function->context()->global() !=
On 2008/12/18 14:27:26, Mads Ager wrote:
> This condition will fit on one line?

Yes, changed.

http://codereview.chromium.org/15035/diff/1/6#newcode1406
Line 1406: if (Debug::InDebugger()) return;
On 2008/12/18 14:27:26, Mads Ager wrote:
> Accidental edit?

Yes, reverted.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698