I wonder if we should be stubbing out function calls or function implementations instead (or ...
11 years, 7 months ago
(2009-05-22 12:47:48 UTC)
#3
I wonder if we should be stubbing out function calls or function implementations
instead (or you could argue that you have stubbed out (part of) an
implementation....).
http://codereview.chromium.org/115706/diff/1/2
File src/bootstrapper.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/115706/diff/1/2#newcode1537
Line 1537: if (!InstallNatives()) return;
There may be a general documentation advantage to moving the #ifdef (with a
TODO) inside Bootstrapper::InstallNatives. It more directly marks that function
(rather than this call site) as one that needs to be looked at.
The cost is that it probably has to become an #ifndef ... #else ... #endif.
http://codereview.chromium.org/115706/diff/1/4
File src/heap.h (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/115706/diff/1/4#newcode1052
Line 1052: ASSERT(Page::IsRSetSet(reinterpret_cast<Address>(current), 0));
Same comment---Page::IsRSetSet could return true in V8_HOST_ARCH_64_BIT.
Lasse Reichstein
Good comments. http://codereview.chromium.org/115706/diff/1/2 File src/bootstrapper.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/115706/diff/1/2#newcode1537 Line 1537: if (!InstallNatives()) return; I have moved ...
11 years, 7 months ago
(2009-05-22 13:10:10 UTC)
#4
Issue 115706: X64: Omitted creating native builtins and using them in test-heap.
(Closed)
Created 11 years, 7 months ago by Lasse Reichstein
Modified 9 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers: William Hesse, Kevin Millikin (Chromium)
Base URL:
Comments: 7