Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(425)

Issue 998933004: Oilpan: use a cross-thread persistent for per-isolate ScriptDebugServers. (Closed)

Created:
5 years, 9 months ago by sof
Modified:
5 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
oilpan-reviews, haraken
CC:
blink-reviews, blink-reviews-bindings_chromium.org, vivekg_samsung, arv+blink, vivekg
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Project:
blink
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Oilpan: use a cross-thread persistent for per-isolate ScriptDebugServers. TBR=oilpan-reviews BUG=462572 NOTRY=true Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=191735

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+7 lines, -1 line) Patch
M Source/bindings/core/v8/V8PerIsolateData.h View 1 chunk +5 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M Source/bindings/core/v8/V8PerIsolateData.cpp View 2 chunks +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6 (1 generated)
sof
please take a look.
5 years, 9 months ago (2015-03-11 21:23:26 UTC) #1
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/998933004/1
5 years, 9 months ago (2015-03-11 21:23:48 UTC) #3
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=191735
5 years, 9 months ago (2015-03-11 21:24:24 UTC) #4
haraken
LGTM Just curious, but how did you notice the error? (i.e., was it easy to ...
5 years, 9 months ago (2015-03-11 23:13:49 UTC) #5
sof
5 years, 9 months ago (2015-03-12 09:30:17 UTC) #6
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2015/03/11 23:13:49, haraken wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> Just curious, but how did you notice the error? (i.e., was it easy to detect
the
> error?)

It was, unfortunately -- all heap unit tests broke; the breakages yesterday made
for a bumpy ride.

The checkThread() assert in ThreadLocalPersistents::Lock::Lock() caught that the
main thread was destructing these persistents.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698