Change device creation to see the (optional) layer-paint

src/core/SkDevice.cpp

Index: src/core/SkDevice.cpp
diff --git a/src/core/SkDevice.cpp b/src/core/SkDevice.cpp
index a77e54c2ffd39f6755e40502f542bcb744add1a1..d76a1808628418246f183b51e6bd59b2acf4948e 100644
--- a/src/core/SkDevice.cpp
+++ b/src/core/SkDevice.cpp
@@ -64,19 +64,16 @@ const SkBitmap& SkBaseDevice::accessBitmap(bool changePixels) {
 }
 
 SkPixelGeometry SkBaseDevice::CreateInfo::AdjustGeometry(const SkImageInfo& info,
-                                                         Usage usage,
+                                                         TileUsage tileUsage,
                                                          SkPixelGeometry geo) {
-    switch (usage) {
-        case kGeneral_Usage:
+    switch (tileUsage) {
+        case kPossible_TileUsage:
             break;
-        case kSaveLayer_Usage:
+        case kNever_TileUsage:

[robertphillips, 2015/03/10 13:49:25]

Did we ever get an answer on why we don't do this for kPossible too?

[reed1, 2015/03/13 14:07:08]

Will add comment.

             if (info.alphaType() != kOpaque_SkAlphaType) {
                 geo = kUnknown_SkPixelGeometry;
             }
             break;
-        case kImageFilter_Usage:
-            geo = kUnknown_SkPixelGeometry;
-            break;
     }
     return geo;
 }
@@ -86,7 +83,7 @@ void SkBaseDevice::initForRootLayer(SkPixelGeometry geo) {
     // anyway to document logically what is going on.
     //
     fLeakyProperties->setPixelGeometry(CreateInfo::AdjustGeometry(this->imageInfo(),
-                                                                  kGeneral_Usage,
+                                                                  kPossible_TileUsage,
                                                                   geo));
 }