Remove the flag to disable new hotwording.

Remove the flag to disable new hotwording.

Removing all the dead code as a result of this is large change and will
be done separately.

BUG=439143
Committed: https://crrev.com/5ded0c90a0d0b68a5b467cc9abcf3a0396d45b9c
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#320843}

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-10 03:55:16]

amistry@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ kcarattini@chromium.org, mgiuca@chromium.org

[Matt Giuca, 2015-03-10 06:18:16]

As discussed, if you are planning to remove all of the other code for M43, I
would just wait until you are sure you don't need it, and delete everything in
one CL (or two CLs close to each other, if you really want to).

I don't think it's a good idea to leave all of these TODOs and disabled tests
and dangling unreachable code around for an indefinite period of time.

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-10 06:42:22]

On 2015/03/10 06:18:16, Matt Giuca wrote:
> As discussed, if you are planning to remove all of the other code for M43, I
> would just wait until you are sure you don't need it, and delete everything in
> one CL (or two CLs close to each other, if you really want to).
> 
> I don't think it's a good idea to leave all of these TODOs and disabled tests
> and dangling unreachable code around for an indefinite period of time.

Well, the follow-up CL which deletes everything is ready to go
(https://codereview.chromium.org/992173002/). I just figured it would be better
on reviewers to split into two logical parts.

[Matt Giuca, 2015-03-11 21:26:43]

OK, lgtm, assuming the next one is going to land in the next few days (I will
look at it shortly).

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-11 23:49:19]

amistry@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ thestig@chromium.org

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-11 23:49:19]

thestig@chromium.org: For OWNERS.

[Lei Zhang, 2015-03-11 23:53:21]

lgtm

[kcarattini, 2015-03-12 03:44:22]

On 2015/03/11 23:53:21, Lei Zhang wrote:
> lgtm

This cl is also removing the field trial check. Don't you have that in a
separate cl?

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-12 04:40:09]

On 2015/03/12 03:44:22, kcarattini wrote:
> On 2015/03/11 23:53:21, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > lgtm
> 
> This cl is also removing the field trial check. Don't you have that in a
> separate cl?

Good point. Then again, if I submit the other one first, the merge conflict is
trivial and semantically irrelevant.

[kcarattini, 2015-03-12 08:13:06]

lgtm

I'd just like the cl description to accurately reflect which cl it's in. If the
other change is already submitted, then no worries.

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-17 00:18:52]

The CQ bit was checked by amistry@chromium.org

[Anand Mistry (off Chromium), 2015-03-17 00:18:53]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
thestig@chromium.org, kcarattini@chromium.org, mgiuca@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/981773003/#ps60001 (title:
"Rebase")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-03-17 00:20:09]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/981773003/60001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-03-17 01:57:09]

Committed patchset #4 (id:60001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-03-17 01:58:03]

Patchset 4 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/5ded0c90a0d0b68a5b467cc9abcf3a0396d45b9c
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#320843}