Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(469)

Unified Diff: google_apis/gcm/engine/gcm_checkin_request_unittest.cc

Issue 98173009: GCM Checkin implementation with unit tests and protobufs (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@gcm-store
Patch Set: Adding protobufs, request/response implementation and unit tests Created 6 years, 12 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: google_apis/gcm/engine/gcm_checkin_request_unittest.cc
diff --git a/google_apis/gcm/engine/gcm_checkin_request_unittest.cc b/google_apis/gcm/engine/gcm_checkin_request_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49c6d42847e4ef8a9c5fff2545fc02102537f648
--- /dev/null
+++ b/google_apis/gcm/engine/gcm_checkin_request_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "base/values.h"
fgorski 2014/01/04 00:54:07 I probably don't need that.
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 Done.
+#include "google_apis/gcm/engine/gcm_checkin_request.h"
+#include "net/url_request/test_url_fetcher_factory.h"
+#include "net/url_request/url_request_test_util.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace gcm {
+
+const int64 kAndroidId = 42;
+const int64 kBlankAndroidId = -1;
+const uint64 kBlankSecurityToken = 999999;
+const char kChromeVersion[] = "Version String";
+const uint64 kSecurityToken = 77;
+const int64 kUserSerialNumber = 7;
+
+#if defined(CHROME_OS)
+const int kExpectedDeviceType = 4;
jianli 2014/01/04 01:34:10 Can we use the enum defined in the proto file?
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 Done.
+#else
+const int kExpectedDeviceType = 3;
+#endif
+
+class GCMCheckinRequestTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+ GCMCheckinRequestTest();
+ virtual ~GCMCheckinRequestTest();
+
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo CreateCheckInInfo();
+
+ void FetcherCallback(uint64 android_id, uint64 security_token);
+
+ void SetResponse(net::TestURLFetcher* fetcher,
+ uint64 android_id,
+ uint64 security_token);
+
+ protected:
+ int64 android_id_;
jianli 2014/01/04 01:34:10 Should we use uint64?
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 No, actually I've not found a protobuf that would
+ uint64 security_token_;
+ int checkin_device_type_;
+ GCMClient::CheckInInfo user_checkin_info_;
fgorski 2014/01/04 00:54:07 I'll remove that.
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 Done.
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo chrome_checkin_info_;
+ base::MessageLoop message_loop_;
+ net::TestURLFetcherFactory factory_;
+ scoped_refptr<net::TestURLRequestContextGetter> getter_;
+};
+
+GCMCheckinRequestTest::GCMCheckinRequestTest()
+ : android_id_(kBlankAndroidId),
+ security_token_(kBlankSecurityToken),
+ checkin_device_type_(0),
+ getter_(new net::TestURLRequestContextGetter(
+ message_loop_.message_loop_proxy())) {}
+
+GCMCheckinRequestTest::~GCMCheckinRequestTest() {}
+
+GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo GCMCheckinRequestTest::CreateCheckInInfo() {
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo chrome_checkin_info;
+ chrome_checkin_info.platform =
+ checkin_proto::ChromeBuildProto::PLATFORM_LINUX;
+ chrome_checkin_info.channel = checkin_proto::ChromeBuildProto::CHANNEL_CANARY;
+ chrome_checkin_info.chrome_version = kChromeVersion;
+ return chrome_checkin_info;
+}
+
+void GCMCheckinRequestTest::FetcherCallback(uint64 android_id,
+ uint64 security_token) {
+ android_id_ = android_id;
+ security_token_ = security_token;
+}
+
+void GCMCheckinRequestTest::SetResponse(net::TestURLFetcher* fetcher,
+ uint64 android_id,
+ uint64 security_token) {
+ checkin_proto::AndroidCheckinResponse response;
+ response.set_stats_ok(true);
+ response.set_android_id(android_id);
+ response.set_security_token(security_token);
+
+ std::string response_string;
+ response.SerializeToString(&response_string);
+ fetcher->SetResponseString(response_string);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GCMCheckinRequestTest, EmptyResponseBody) {
jianli 2014/01/04 01:34:10 Do we also need to have the test coverage for the
jianli 2014/01/06 21:00:01 ???
fgorski 2014/01/06 21:58:03 Done.
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo chrome_checkin_info = CreateCheckInInfo();
+ GCMCheckinRequest request(base::Bind(&GCMCheckinRequestTest::FetcherCallback,
+ base::Unretained(this)),
+ getter_.get(),
+ chrome_checkin_info,
+ kUserSerialNumber,
+ user_checkin_info_);
+ request.Start();
Nicolas Zea 2014/01/04 01:40:19 nit: newline after (to match other tests)
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 Done.
+ EXPECT_EQ(kBlankAndroidId, android_id_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kBlankSecurityToken, security_token_);
+ net::TestURLFetcher* fetcher = factory_.GetFetcherByID(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(fetcher);
+ fetcher->set_response_code(net::HTTP_OK);
+ fetcher->SetResponseString(std::string());
+ fetcher->delegate()->OnURLFetchComplete(fetcher);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, android_id_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, security_token_);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GCMCheckinRequestTest, FetcherData) {
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo chrome_checkin_info = CreateCheckInInfo();
+ user_checkin_info_.android_id = kAndroidId;
+ user_checkin_info_.secret = kSecurityToken;
+ GCMCheckinRequest request(base::Bind(&GCMCheckinRequestTest::FetcherCallback,
+ base::Unretained(this)),
+ getter_.get(),
+ chrome_checkin_info,
+ kUserSerialNumber,
+ user_checkin_info_);
+ request.Start();
+
+ net::TestURLFetcher* fetcher = factory_.GetFetcherByID(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(fetcher);
+ fetcher->set_response_code(net::HTTP_OK);
+ checkin_proto::AndroidCheckinRequest request_proto;
+ request_proto.ParseFromString(fetcher->upload_data());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kAndroidId, request_proto.id());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kSecurityToken, request_proto.security_token());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kUserSerialNumber, request_proto.user_serial_number());
+ EXPECT_EQ(chrome_checkin_info.platform,
+ request_proto.checkin().chrome_build().platform());
+ EXPECT_EQ(chrome_checkin_info.chrome_version,
+ request_proto.checkin().chrome_build().chrome_version());
+ EXPECT_EQ(chrome_checkin_info.channel,
+ request_proto.checkin().chrome_build().channel());
+ EXPECT_EQ(kExpectedDeviceType, request_proto.checkin().type());
+}
+
+TEST_F(GCMCheckinRequestTest, SuccessfulCheckin) {
jianli 2014/01/04 01:34:10 Is this to test subsequent checkin? If so, better
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 Done.
jianli 2014/01/06 21:00:01 It is still the old name in your new patch.
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo chrome_checkin_info = CreateCheckInInfo();
+ user_checkin_info_.android_id = kAndroidId;
+ user_checkin_info_.secret = kSecurityToken;
+ GCMCheckinRequest request(base::Bind(&GCMCheckinRequestTest::FetcherCallback,
+ base::Unretained(this)),
+ getter_.get(),
+ chrome_checkin_info,
+ kUserSerialNumber,
+ user_checkin_info_);
+ request.Start();
Nicolas Zea 2014/01/04 01:40:19 nit: newline after (to match other tests)
fgorski 2014/01/06 20:34:12 Done.
+ EXPECT_EQ(kBlankAndroidId, android_id_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kBlankSecurityToken, security_token_);
+ net::TestURLFetcher* fetcher = factory_.GetFetcherByID(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(fetcher);
+ fetcher->set_response_code(net::HTTP_OK);
+ SetResponse(fetcher, kAndroidId, kSecurityToken);
+ fetcher->delegate()->OnURLFetchComplete(fetcher);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kAndroidId, android_id_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kSecurityToken, security_token_);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GCMCheckinRequestTest, SuccessfulFirstTimeCheckin) {
+ GCMClient::ChromeCheckInInfo chrome_checkin_info = CreateCheckInInfo();
+ GCMCheckinRequest request(base::Bind(&GCMCheckinRequestTest::FetcherCallback,
+ base::Unretained(this)),
+ getter_.get(),
+ chrome_checkin_info,
+ kUserSerialNumber,
+ user_checkin_info_);
+ request.Start();
+
+ net::TestURLFetcher* fetcher = factory_.GetFetcherByID(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(fetcher);
+ fetcher->set_response_code(net::HTTP_OK);
+ SetResponse(fetcher, kAndroidId, kSecurityToken);
+ fetcher->delegate()->OnURLFetchComplete(fetcher);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kAndroidId, android_id_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kSecurityToken, security_token_);
+}
+
+} // namespace gcm

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698