Upgrade openjpeg to revision 2997.

Upgrade openjpeg to revision 2997.

BUG=457493
R=tsepez@chromium.org

Committed: https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/ec61a859344dc6d2a60e4cbcd1555e6d317f2add

[jun_fang, 2015-02-26 19:27:11]

jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com changed reviewers:
+ thestig@chromium.org, tsepez@chromium.org

[jun_fang, 2015-02-26 19:27:11]

Hi Tom and Lei,

Recently, some openjpeg issues were opened in pdfium. Most of them can be
reproduced in the last version. Even that, I upgrade openjpeg to 2997 so that we
can verify coming openjpeg issues in the last version. Please review this
upgrade. Thanks!

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-26 22:58:03]

https://codereview.chromium.org/960183004/diff/1/core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenj...
File core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenjpeg/libopenjpeg20/t2.c (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/960183004/diff/1/core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenj...
core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenjpeg/libopenjpeg20/t2.c:391: 
Looks like this file is whitespace only.  Did they do this upstream?  Or did
this get introduced while you were processing the diff?

[jun_fang, 2015-02-27 00:28:04]

On 2015/02/26 22:58:03, Tom Sepez wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/960183004/diff/1/core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenj...
> File core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenjpeg/libopenjpeg20/t2.c (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/960183004/diff/1/core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenj...
> core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenjpeg/libopenjpeg20/t2.c:391: 
> Looks like this file is whitespace only.  Did they do this upstream?  Or did
> this get introduced while you were processing the diff?

I double check the diff and confirm that some tabs were introdcued in revision
2997.

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-27 17:56:12]

On 2015/02/27 00:28:04, jun_fang wrote:
> On 2015/02/26 22:58:03, Tom Sepez wrote:
> >
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/960183004/diff/1/core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenj...
> > File core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenjpeg/libopenjpeg20/t2.c (right):
> > 
> >
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/960183004/diff/1/core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenj...
> > core/src/fxcodec/fx_libopenjpeg/libopenjpeg20/t2.c:391: 
> > Looks like this file is whitespace only.  Did they do this upstream?  Or did
> > this get introduced while you were processing the diff?
> 
> I double check the diff and confirm that some tabs were introdcued in revision
> 2997.

LGTM

[jun_fang, 2015-02-27 18:00:10]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
ec61a859344dc6d2a60e4cbcd1555e6d317f2add (presubmit successful).