Update the script that downloads the dart sdk so we can roll it.

Update the script that downloads the dart sdk so we can roll it.

Then roll the SDK. This will let us pick up the changes to dartanalyzer
so we can run it as a build step.

BUG=459376
R=sky@chromium.org

Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/mojo/+/d21890ec71f93a9f8a68f38467304aacad4a634c

[Elliot Glaysher, 2015-02-23 22:00:13]

erg@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ sky@chromium.org

[sky, 2015-02-23 22:05:07]

LGTM

[Elliot Glaysher, 2015-02-23 22:17:18]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
d21890ec71f93a9f8a68f38467304aacad4a634c (presubmit successful).

[azani, 2015-02-26 00:17:11]

On 2015/02/23 22:17:18, Elliot Glaysher wrote:
> Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
> d21890ec71f93a9f8a68f38467304aacad4a634c (presubmit successful).

It looks like gclient sync doesn't behave well if dart-sdk/ does not already
exist. I can't confirm that it is related to this patch, but this looks like the
most likely culprit.

[Elliot Glaysher, 2015-02-26 18:41:10]

On 2015/02/26 00:17:11, azani wrote:
> On 2015/02/23 22:17:18, Elliot Glaysher wrote:
> > Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
> > d21890ec71f93a9f8a68f38467304aacad4a634c (presubmit successful).
> 
> It looks like gclient sync doesn't behave well if dart-sdk/ does not already
> exist. I can't confirm that it is related to this patch, but this looks like
the
> most likely culprit.

Did you roll past https://codereview.chromium.org/943843003/ ? We were seeing
something like that on only one of the trybots, but not the main waterfall.