Kill off unused IFXJS interface methods.

Moved to https://codereview.chromium.org/954923004/

Kill off unused IFXJS interface methods.

Much of the IFXJS interface appears completely unused, so
Kill off unused IFXJS interface methods.  The code itself
appears incomplete against all of the objects present
in the paths that actually do register objects with JS.

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-18 18:23:34]

tsepez@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-18 18:23:34]

Jun, could you take a look at this and run it by your developers?  I don't think
that our V8 interfaces actually make any use of this, and it is dead code, but
please confirm.

[jun_fang, 2015-02-19 23:16:56]

On 2015/02/18 18:23:34, Tom Sepez wrote:
> Jun, could you take a look at this and run it by your developers?  I don't
think
> that our V8 interfaces actually make any use of this, and it is dead code, but
> please confirm.

Hi Tom,

our developer team is taking spring festival. They will be back to work in one
week.

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-20 00:05:48]

On 2015/02/19 23:16:56, jun_fang wrote:
> On 2015/02/18 18:23:34, Tom Sepez wrote:
> > Jun, could you take a look at this and run it by your developers?  I don't
> think
> > that our V8 interfaces actually make any use of this, and it is dead code,
but
> > please confirm.
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> our developer team is taking spring festival. They will be back to work in one
> week.


Ok, not a problem.  Hope they have a good time.

[jun_fang, 2015-02-20 00:20:26]

On 2015/02/20 00:05:48, Tom Sepez wrote:
> On 2015/02/19 23:16:56, jun_fang wrote:
> > On 2015/02/18 18:23:34, Tom Sepez wrote:
> > > Jun, could you take a look at this and run it by your developers?  I don't
> > think
> > > that our V8 interfaces actually make any use of this, and it is dead code,
> but
> > > please confirm.
> > 
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > our developer team is taking spring festival. They will be back to work in
one
> > week.
> 
> 
> Ok, not a problem.  Hope they have a good time.

Thanks! I will ask them to confirm when they come back.

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-24 23:15:57]

tsepez@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ thestig@chromium.org

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-24 23:16:30]

Lei, I should probably have CC'd you on this as well.

[Lei Zhang, 2015-02-25 20:10:56]

Should we remove this on the main branch too?

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-25 22:15:14]

On 2015/02/25 20:10:56, Lei Zhang wrote:
> Should we remove this on the main branch too?
Yes.  I made the initial hack at this on XFA, figuring if XFA doesn't need it,
then main doesn't either.

[Lei Zhang, 2015-02-25 22:17:04]

On 2015/02/25 22:15:14, Tom Sepez wrote:
> On 2015/02/25 20:10:56, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > Should we remove this on the main branch too?
> Yes.  I made the initial hack at this on XFA, figuring if XFA doesn't need it,
> then main doesn't either.

Can we make the change on the main branch first and then merge to XFA, which is
what we do most of the time.

[Tom Sepez, 2015-02-25 22:19:37]

On 2015/02/25 22:17:04, Lei Zhang wrote:
> On 2015/02/25 22:15:14, Tom Sepez wrote:
> > On 2015/02/25 20:10:56, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > > Should we remove this on the main branch too?
> > Yes.  I made the initial hack at this on XFA, figuring if XFA doesn't need
it,
> > then main doesn't either.
> 
> Can we make the change on the main branch first and then merge to XFA, which
is
> what we do most of the time.
Sure.  No problem.  I'll upload a new CL.

[jun_fang, 2015-03-02 15:36:42]

On 2015/02/25 22:19:37, Tom Sepez wrote:
> On 2015/02/25 22:17:04, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > On 2015/02/25 22:15:14, Tom Sepez wrote:
> > > On 2015/02/25 20:10:56, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > > > Should we remove this on the main branch too?
> > > Yes.  I made the initial hack at this on XFA, figuring if XFA doesn't need
> it,
> > > then main doesn't either.
> > 
> > Can we make the change on the main branch first and then merge to XFA, which
> is
> > what we do most of the time.
> Sure.  No problem.  I'll upload a new CL.

Confirmed with our developers, it's fine to remove unused IFXJS interface
methods.