Chromium Code Reviews| Index: Source/core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.cpp |
| diff --git a/Source/core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.cpp b/Source/core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.cpp |
| new file mode 100644 |
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..483f2eb21582f8e2e4f9c156f02dc04b58cdf0d7 |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/Source/core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.cpp |
| @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ |
| +/* |
| + * Copyright (C) 2013 Google Inc. All rights reserved. |
| + * |
| + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
| + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are |
| + * met: |
| + * |
| + * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
| + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
| + * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above |
| + * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer |
| + * in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the |
| + * distribution. |
| + * * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its |
| + * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from |
| + * this software without specific prior written permission. |
| + * |
| + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS |
| + * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
| + * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR |
| + * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT |
| + * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, |
| + * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
| + * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, |
| + * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY |
| + * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
| + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
| + * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
| + */ |
| + |
| +#include "config.h" |
| +#include "core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.h" |
| + |
| +namespace WebCore { |
| + |
| +ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::ResourceAndVisibility(ImageResource* img, bool v) |
| + : imageResource(img) |
| + , visible(v) |
| +{ |
| +} |
| + |
| +ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::ResourceAndVisibility() |
|
eseidel
2013/11/25 23:59:30
Shoud this just have one constructor and have it h
shatch
2013/11/26 01:35:18
Both std::map and HashMap seem to want a default c
|
| + : imageResource(0) |
| + , visible(false) |
| +{ |
| +} |
| + |
| +ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::ResourceAndVisibility(const ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility& o) |
|
eseidel
2013/11/25 23:59:30
Again, my C++ is a bit weak here. How is this dif
shatch
2013/11/26 01:35:18
Yeah I think you're right, it's not any different,
|
| + : imageResource(o.imageResource) |
| + , visible(o.visible) |
| +{ |
| +} |
| + |
| +ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::~ResourceAndVisibility() |
| +{ |
| +} |
| + |
| +ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer() |
| +{ |
| +} |
| + |
| +ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::~ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer() |
| +{ |
| + updateImageResourcesWithLoadPriority(); |
| +} |
| + |
| +void ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::updateImageResourcesWithLoadPriority() |
| +{ |
| + for (ImageResourceMap::iterator it = m_imageResources.begin(); it != m_imageResources.end(); ++it) { |
| + ResourceLoadPriority priority = it->second.visible ? ResourceLoadPriorityLow : ResourceLoadPriorityVeryLow; |
| + it->second.imageResource->didChangePriority(priority); |
| + } |
| + m_imageResources.clear(); |
| +} |
| + |
| +void ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::notifyImageResourceVisibility(ImageResource* img, bool visible) |
| +{ |
| + if (!img || img->isLoaded()) |
| + return; |
| + |
| + if (visible) { |
| + m_imageResources[img->identifier()] = ResourceAndVisibility(img, visible); |
| + } else { |
| + // If the resource exists in the map, don't overwrite since it might have been visible from |
| + // some other RenderObject. |
| + if (m_imageResources.find(img->identifier()) == m_imageResources.end()) |
|
eseidel
2013/11/25 23:59:30
I'm surprised this doesn't have a .contains()? I
shatch
2013/11/26 01:35:18
Yeah it was a std::map, don't believe it has a con
|
| + m_imageResources[img->identifier()] = ResourceAndVisibility(img, visible); |
| + } |
| +} |
| + |
| +} |