Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(86)

Side by Side Diff: Source/core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.cpp

Issue 86533002: Raise the loading priority of in-viewport images. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Patch Set: Created 7 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 /*
2 * Copyright (C) 2013 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
3 *
4 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
5 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
6 * met:
7 *
8 * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
9 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
10 * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
11 * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
12 * in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
13 * distribution.
14 * * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
15 * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
16 * this software without specific prior written permission.
17 *
18 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
19 * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
20 * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
21 * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
22 * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
23 * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
24 * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
25 * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
26 * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
27 * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
28 * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
29 */
30
31 #include "config.h"
32 #include "core/fetch/ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer.h"
33
34 namespace WebCore {
35
36 ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::ResourceAndVisibility(Imag eResource* img, bool v)
37 : imageResource(img)
38 , visible(v)
39 {
40 }
41
42 ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::ResourceAndVisibility()
eseidel 2013/11/25 23:59:30 Shoud this just have one constructor and have it h
shatch 2013/11/26 01:35:18 Both std::map and HashMap seem to want a default c
43 : imageResource(0)
44 , visible(false)
45 {
46 }
47
48 ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::ResourceAndVisibility(cons t ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility& o)
eseidel 2013/11/25 23:59:30 Again, my C++ is a bit weak here. How is this dif
shatch 2013/11/26 01:35:18 Yeah I think you're right, it's not any different,
49 : imageResource(o.imageResource)
50 , visible(o.visible)
51 {
52 }
53
54 ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceAndVisibility::~ResourceAndVisibility()
55 {
56 }
57
58 ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer()
59 {
60 }
61
62 ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::~ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer()
63 {
64 updateImageResourcesWithLoadPriority();
65 }
66
67 void ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::updateImageResourcesWithLoadPriority()
68 {
69 for (ImageResourceMap::iterator it = m_imageResources.begin(); it != m_image Resources.end(); ++it) {
70 ResourceLoadPriority priority = it->second.visible ? ResourceLoadPriorit yLow : ResourceLoadPriorityVeryLow;
71 it->second.imageResource->didChangePriority(priority);
72 }
73 m_imageResources.clear();
74 }
75
76 void ResourceLoadPriorityOptimizer::notifyImageResourceVisibility(ImageResource* img, bool visible)
77 {
78 if (!img || img->isLoaded())
79 return;
80
81 if (visible) {
82 m_imageResources[img->identifier()] = ResourceAndVisibility(img, visible );
83 } else {
84 // If the resource exists in the map, don't overwrite since it might hav e been visible from
85 // some other RenderObject.
86 if (m_imageResources.find(img->identifier()) == m_imageResources.end())
eseidel 2013/11/25 23:59:30 I'm surprised this doesn't have a .contains()? I
shatch 2013/11/26 01:35:18 Yeah it was a std::map, don't believe it has a con
87 m_imageResources[img->identifier()] = ResourceAndVisibility(img, vis ible);
88 }
89 }
90
91 }
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698