Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1995)

Unified Diff: content/child/webcrypto/nss/rsa_key_nss.cc

Issue 777403004: [WebCrypto] Throw syntaxError if keyUsage is empty in ImportKey (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/child/webcrypto/nss/rsa_key_nss.cc
diff --git a/content/child/webcrypto/nss/rsa_key_nss.cc b/content/child/webcrypto/nss/rsa_key_nss.cc
index 7a35593c18bdd75b2bfd5d7cd6e29704aa5f069b..24ae9d3e89b3e37c4d0d0edd29929cb244b8238c 100644
--- a/content/child/webcrypto/nss/rsa_key_nss.cc
+++ b/content/child/webcrypto/nss/rsa_key_nss.cc
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ Status RsaHashedAlgorithm::GenerateKey(
blink::WebCryptoKeyUsageMask combined_usages,
GenerateKeyResult* result) const {
Status status = CheckKeyCreationUsages(
- all_public_key_usages_ | all_private_key_usages_, combined_usages);
+ all_public_key_usages_ | all_private_key_usages_, combined_usages, false);
eroman 2014/12/09 21:04:46 I am proposing a refactor in: https://codereview.
Habib Virji 2014/12/15 18:48:55 Adapted to your changes.
if (status.IsError())
return status;
@@ -590,15 +590,17 @@ Status RsaHashedAlgorithm::VerifyKeyUsagesBeforeImportKey(
blink::WebCryptoKeyUsageMask usages) const {
switch (format) {
case blink::WebCryptoKeyFormatSpki:
- return CheckKeyCreationUsages(all_public_key_usages_, usages);
+ return CheckKeyCreationUsages(all_public_key_usages_, usages, false);
case blink::WebCryptoKeyFormatPkcs8:
- return CheckKeyCreationUsages(all_private_key_usages_, usages);
+ return CheckKeyCreationUsages(all_private_key_usages_, usages, true);
case blink::WebCryptoKeyFormatJwk:
// The JWK could represent either a public key or private key. The usages
// must make sense for one of the two. The usages will be checked again by
// ImportKeyJwk() once the key type has been determined.
- if (CheckKeyCreationUsages(all_private_key_usages_, usages).IsSuccess() ||
- CheckKeyCreationUsages(all_public_key_usages_, usages).IsSuccess()) {
+ if (CheckKeyCreationUsages(
+ all_private_key_usages_, usages, true).IsSuccess() ||
eroman 2014/12/09 21:04:46 I am proposing a refactor in https://codereview.ch
Habib Virji 2014/12/15 18:48:55 Adapted to your changes.
+ CheckKeyCreationUsages(
+ all_public_key_usages_, usages, false).IsSuccess()) {
return Status::Success();
}
return Status::ErrorCreateKeyBadUsages();
@@ -763,7 +765,7 @@ Status RsaHashedAlgorithm::ImportKeyJwk(
// Once the key type is known, verify the usages.
status = CheckKeyCreationUsages(
jwk.is_private_key ? all_private_key_usages_ : all_public_key_usages_,
- usages);
+ usages, jwk.is_private_key ? true : false);
eroman 2014/12/09 21:04:46 This is already a bool no need for ternary operato
Habib Virji 2014/12/15 18:48:55 Corrected.
if (status.IsError())
return Status::ErrorCreateKeyBadUsages();
eroman 2014/12/09 21:04:46 On a side note, I wander whey this isn't just "ret
Habib Virji 2014/12/15 18:48:55 Adapted to just return status.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698