Specs: make element registrations be per-module, define how they are

Specs: make element registrations be per-module, define how they are
exported and reexported, rename 'interface' to 'class' in the IDL, add
constructors to all registered elements

R=esprehn@chromium.org

Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/mojo/+/24f44cd9d48cb4308251b0176f2d895a6245e57e

[esprehn, 2014-10-31 23:13:43]

esprehn@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ esprehn@chromium.org

[esprehn, 2014-10-31 23:13:44]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/README.md
File sky/README.md (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/README.md#newcode78
sky/README.md:78: this.shadowRoot.firstChild.replaceWith(new Date());
I assume this does a toString() since it's not a Node?

https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/specs/apis.md
File sky/specs/apis.md (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/specs/apis.md#newcode90
sky/specs/apis.md:90: abstract class Element : ParentNode {
Do we get rid of "upgrade" ? Right now custom elements start off as Element
instances before we prototype swizzle them.

[Hixie, 2014-10-31 23:15:36]

On 2014/10/31 23:13:44, esprehn wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/README.md
> File sky/README.md (right):
> 
> https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/README.md#newcode78
> sky/README.md:78: this.shadowRoot.firstChild.replaceWith(new Date());
> I assume this does a toString() since it's not a Node?

That's my theory. If that's not the behaviour that we'll get for free we should
probably do something to get it.


> https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/specs/apis.md
> File sky/specs/apis.md (right):
> 
> https://codereview.chromium.org/695043002/diff/1/sky/specs/apis.md#newcode90
> sky/specs/apis.md:90: abstract class Element : ParentNode {
> Do we get rid of "upgrade" ? Right now custom elements start off as Element
> instances before we prototype swizzle them.

This continues to be the case. I just marked it "abstract" because you can't
construct it — it's basically my way of saying "yes, I know I didn't put a
constructor on this thing, it's intentional."

[Hixie, 2014-10-31 23:18:50]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
24f44cd9d48cb4308251b0176f2d895a6245e57e.