Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(383)

Issue 550163003: Go back to old underline position and thickness logic (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 3 months ago by eae
Modified:
6 years, 3 months ago
CC:
blink-reviews, jamesr, krit, jbroman, danakj, Rik, Stephen Chennney, pdr., rwlbuis
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Project:
blink
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Go back to old underline position and thickness logic In r174431 from May this year we changed the underline position and thickness logic to respect the underline data specified in the font. While this improved rendering for certain fonts and scripts it did cause a regression for others. This change reverts to the old behavior while we figure out how to handle fonts with inaccurate or undesirable metrics. BUG=408075 R=scottmg@chromium.org, cpu@chromium.org Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=181591

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : w/TestExpectations #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+98 lines, -7 lines) Patch
M LayoutTests/TestExpectations View 1 1 chunk +98 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M Source/platform/fonts/skia/SimpleFontDataSkia.cpp View 1 chunk +0 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 11 (3 generated)
eae
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-08 23:45:07 UTC) #2
scottmg
The default seems to be 0, it doesn't need to do something like? https://codereview.chromium.org/295923006/diff/20001/Source/platform/fonts/skia/SimpleFontDataSkia.cpp?context=10&column_width=80
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-08 23:50:36 UTC) #3
scottmg
Sorry, that was just applying it it looks like. Assuming something sensible is done when ...
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-08 23:52:07 UTC) #4
eae
On 2014/09/08 23:52:07, scottmg wrote: > Sorry, that was just applying it it looks like. ...
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-08 23:54:42 UTC) #5
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/eae@chromium.org/550163003/20001
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-08 23:55:54 UTC) #7
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) as 181591
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-09 00:57:47 UTC) #8
keishi
A revert of this CL (patchset #2 id:20001) has been created in https://codereview.chromium.org/557653002/ by keishi@chromium.org. ...
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-09 05:08:03 UTC) #9
eae
6 years, 3 months ago (2014-09-09 15:18:32 UTC) #10
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2014/09/09 05:08:03, keishi wrote:
> A revert of this CL (patchset #2 id:20001) has been created in
> https://codereview.chromium.org/557653002/ by mailto:keishi@chromium.org.
> 
> The reason for reverting is: Many tests failed on WinXP because of different
> underline position..

Sigh. Stupid lack of try bots. 
Those tests just needs to be rebaselined. Will re-land with updated
expectations.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698