Index: content/browser/loader/resource_scheduler.cc |
diff --git a/content/browser/loader/resource_scheduler.cc b/content/browser/loader/resource_scheduler.cc |
index d458936ecf1e29110a8a935fbcbcca3ad155f5a6..3c735aea646f10a0ef173471a443eb3e478edd5c 100644 |
--- a/content/browser/loader/resource_scheduler.cc |
+++ b/content/browser/loader/resource_scheduler.cc |
@@ -290,7 +290,8 @@ void ResourceScheduler::ReprioritizeRequest(ScheduledResourceRequest* request, |
} |
client->pending_requests.Erase(request); |
- client->pending_requests.Insert(request, request->url_request()->priority()); |
+ client->pending_requests.Insert(request, |
akalin
2013/10/30 23:32:16
should this also do InsertAtFront if ignore_limits
akalin
2013/11/01 07:02:47
Matt, any opinion here? Should I add a TODO?
mmenke
2013/11/01 15:48:00
We shouldn't be reprioritizing those requests in t
akalin
2013/11/01 18:50:15
Ah, right. Added a check instead.
|
+ request->url_request()->priority()); |
if (new_priority > old_priority) { |
// Check if this request is now able to load at its new priority. |