Revert of Try backing SkPicture with SkRecord in Chromium.

Revert of Try backing SkPicture with SkRecord in Chromium. (patchset #2 of https://codereview.chromium.org/504823003/)

Reason for revert:
Appears to leak bitmaps.

Original issue's description:
> Try backing SkPicture with SkRecord in Chromium.
> 
> This is our first attempt, mostly to feel this out.  Performance and
> correctness problems are both possible.  Please revert this if a benchmark even
> smells funny.
> 
> That said, we've been working on this a while, are pretty confident it's good
> stuff, and have had Skia's internal testing entirely switched over for a week.
> Parts of Chromium that serialize and deserialize SkPictures are already
> switched over.  This CL finishes things off by switching the default
> recorded-from-scratch SkPicture to use SkRecord too.
> 
> BUG=
> 
> Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/f7450daaf38f4951b23fabaaaf659c6af33a705c

TBR=reed@google.com,senorblanco@chromium.org,eroman@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/a1a039aef4435565568544a2d4684a6f53d56b99
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#292189}

[mtklein, 2014-08-27 18:23:46]

Created Revert of Try backing SkPicture with SkRecord in Chromium.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-08-27 18:25:17]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@google.com/513793003/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-08-27 18:25:18]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-08-27 18:25:19]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer or
a provisional committer, _not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[bungeman-chromium, 2014-08-27 18:28:19]

On 2014/08/27 18:25:19, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer or
> a provisional committer, _not_ a full super star committer.
> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

lgtm

[mtklein, 2014-08-27 18:28:25]

The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-08-27 18:29:18]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@google.com/513793003/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-08-27 18:30:12]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as 7f5bb946c87b40af7a63d7acc779136d37c6ff0b

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-09-10 02:52:54]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/a1a039aef4435565568544a2d4684a6f53d56b99
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#292189}