Index: source/libvpx/third_party/googletest/src/test/gtest_output_test_.cc |
=================================================================== |
--- source/libvpx/third_party/googletest/src/test/gtest_output_test_.cc (revision 232233) |
+++ source/libvpx/third_party/googletest/src/test/gtest_output_test_.cc (working copy) |
@@ -1,1020 +0,0 @@ |
-// Copyright 2005, Google Inc. |
-// All rights reserved. |
-// |
-// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
-// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are |
-// met: |
-// |
-// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
-// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
-// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above |
-// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer |
-// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the |
-// distribution. |
-// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its |
-// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from |
-// this software without specific prior written permission. |
-// |
-// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS |
-// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
-// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR |
-// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT |
-// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, |
-// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
-// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, |
-// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY |
-// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
-// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
-// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
-// |
-// A unit test for Google Test itself. This verifies that the basic |
-// constructs of Google Test work. |
-// |
-// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) |
- |
-#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" |
-#include "gtest/gtest.h" |
- |
-// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's |
-// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is |
-// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to |
-// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in |
-// his code. |
-#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 |
-#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" |
-#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ |
- |
-#include <stdlib.h> |
- |
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
-using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter; |
-using testing::TestPartResultArray; |
- |
-using testing::internal::Notification; |
-using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; |
-#endif |
- |
-namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; |
-using testing::internal::String; |
-using testing::internal::scoped_ptr; |
- |
-// Tests catching fatal failures. |
- |
-// A subroutine used by the following test. |
-void TestEq1(int x) { |
- ASSERT_EQ(1, x); |
-} |
- |
-// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it |
-// generates, and then returns early. |
-void TryTestSubroutine() { |
- // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
- TestEq1(2); |
- |
- // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
- // |
- // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling |
- // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture. |
- if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; |
- |
- // If we get here, something is wrong. |
- FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
-} |
- |
-TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) { |
-} |
- |
-TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) { |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the |
-// failing test summary. |
-class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; |
- |
-TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { |
- EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); |
-} |
- |
-// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print |
-// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests. |
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams, |
- FailingParamTest, |
- testing::Values(2)); |
- |
-// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine. |
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
- |
- TryTestSubroutine(); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine. |
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
- |
- // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
- TryTestSubroutine(); |
- |
- // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
- // |
- // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test |
- // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed. |
- if (HasFatalFailure()) return; |
- |
- // If we get here, something is wrong. |
- FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check. |
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n"); |
- EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure |
- ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed. |
-} |
- |
-// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions. |
-TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) { |
- static const int a[4] = { |
- 3, 9, 2, 6 |
- }; |
- |
- printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n"); |
- for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) { |
- printf("i == %d\n", i); |
- EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]); |
- } |
-} |
- |
-// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro. |
- |
-// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
-void SubWithoutTrace(int n) { |
- EXPECT_EQ(1, n); |
- ASSERT_EQ(2, n); |
-} |
- |
-// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
-void SubWithTrace(int n) { |
- SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n); |
- |
- SubWithoutTrace(n); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. |
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { |
- printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
- |
- // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked. |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
- |
- { |
- SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace"); |
- // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain |
- // the trace. |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace."; |
- } |
- |
- // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there |
- // should be no trace again. |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop. |
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) { |
- printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
- |
- for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) { |
- SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i); |
- |
- SubWithoutTrace(i); |
- } |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine. |
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) { |
- printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
- |
- SubWithTrace(1); |
- SubWithTrace(2); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested. |
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) { |
- printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
- |
- SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message. |
- |
- SubWithTrace(2); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope. |
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) { |
- printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
- |
- SCOPED_TRACE("A"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A."; |
- |
- SCOPED_TRACE("B"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B."; |
- |
- { |
- SCOPED_TRACE("C"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain " |
- << "trace point A, B, and C."; |
- } |
- |
- SCOPED_TRACE("D"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain " |
- << "trace point A, B, and D."; |
-} |
- |
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple |
-// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by |
-// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only. |
- |
-// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test: |
-// |
-// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned) |
-// ===============================|================================ |
-// spawns thread B | |
-// -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
-// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
-// | generates failure #1 |
-// | notifies n1 |
-// -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
-// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2 |
-// generates failure #2 | |
-// notifies n2 | |
-// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
-// waits for n3 | generates failure #3 |
-// | trace B dies |
-// | generates failure #4 |
-// | notifies n3 |
-// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
-// generates failure #5 | finishes |
-// trace A dies | |
-// generates failure #6 | |
-// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
-// waits for thread B to finish | |
- |
-struct CheckPoints { |
- Notification n1; |
- Notification n2; |
- Notification n3; |
-}; |
- |
-static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) { |
- { |
- SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive)."; |
- check_points->n1.Notify(); |
- check_points->n2.WaitForNotification(); |
- |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive)."; |
- } // Trace B dies here. |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive)."; |
- check_points->n3.Notify(); |
-} |
- |
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { |
- printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n"); |
- |
- CheckPoints check_points; |
- ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, |
- &check_points, |
- NULL); |
- check_points.n1.WaitForNotification(); |
- |
- { |
- SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive)."; |
- check_points.n2.Notify(); |
- check_points.n3.WaitForNotification(); |
- |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive)."; |
- } // Trace A dies here. |
- ADD_FAILURE() |
- << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive)."; |
- thread.Join(); |
-} |
-#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
- |
-TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, |
- DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { |
- // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for |
- // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag |
- // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of |
- // the test output. |
-} |
- |
-// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F. |
-// |
-// This function creates two failures intentionally. |
-void AdHocTest() { |
- printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n"); |
- EXPECT_TRUE(false); |
- EXPECT_EQ(2, 3); |
-} |
- |
-// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test. |
-int RunAllTests() { |
- AdHocTest(); |
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
-class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
- protected: |
- NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
- printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
- } |
- |
- ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
- } |
- |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; |
- } |
- |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown."; |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
-class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
- protected: |
- FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
- Init(); |
- } |
- |
- ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
- } |
- |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). " |
- << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
- << "had a fatal failure."; |
- } |
- |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). " |
- << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
- << "had a fatal failure."; |
- } |
- private: |
- void Init() { |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. " |
- << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
- << "had a fatal failure."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp(). |
-class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
- protected: |
- virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
- Deinit(); |
- } |
- |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
- } |
- |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; |
- } |
- private: |
- void Deinit() { |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests fatal failures in SetUp(). |
-class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
- protected: |
- virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
- Deinit(); |
- } |
- |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n"); |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
- } |
- |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; |
- } |
- private: |
- void Deinit() { |
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
- FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. " |
- << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed."; |
-} |
- |
-TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) { |
- ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc"; |
-} |
- |
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
- |
-// A unary function that may die. |
-void DieIf(bool should_die) { |
- GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf()."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context. |
- |
-// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread. |
-struct SpawnThreadNotifications { |
- SpawnThreadNotifications() {} |
- |
- Notification spawn_thread_started; |
- Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate; |
- |
- private: |
- GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications); |
-}; |
- |
-// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the |
-// MultipleThreads test (below). |
-static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) { |
- // Signals the main thread that this thread has started. |
- notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify(); |
- |
- // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread. |
- notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification(); |
-} |
- |
-// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest |
-// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later |
-// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests. |
-class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test { |
- protected: |
- // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin. |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>( |
- &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL)); |
- notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification(); |
- } |
- // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it. |
- // Depending on the version of the thread library in use, |
- // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere |
- // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class |
- // cleans up after itself as best it can. |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify(); |
- } |
- |
- private: |
- SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_; |
- scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_; |
-}; |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
- |
-// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a |
-// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in |
-// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture |
-// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces. |
- |
-// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that |
-// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND |
-// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will |
-// fail. |
- |
-namespace foo { |
- |
-class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
- |
-class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
- TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
- |
-} // namespace foo |
- |
-namespace bar { |
- |
-class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the |
-// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message. |
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {} |
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {} |
- |
-class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
-// generates the right error message. |
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
- TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
- |
-} // namespace bar |
- |
-// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user |
-// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first |
-// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and |
-// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F. |
- |
-class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {} |
- |
-// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
-// generates the right error message. |
-TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {} |
- |
-class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {} |
- |
-// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
-// generates the right error message. |
-TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) { |
-} |
- |
-// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(). |
-int global_integer = 0; |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
- global_integer = 0; |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
- }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables |
-// (static or not). |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) { |
- int m = 0; |
- static int n; |
- n = 1; |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
- }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
-// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
- }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no |
-// non-fatal failure. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
-// non-fatal failures. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1."; |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2."; |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal |
-// failure. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
-// tested returns. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- return; |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
-// tested throws. |
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- try { |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
- throw 0; |
- }, ""); |
- } catch(int) { // NOLINT |
- } |
-} |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
- global_integer = 0; |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
- }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static |
-// variables. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) { |
- static int n; |
- n = 1; |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
- }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
-// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
- }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal |
-// failure. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-// A helper for generating a fatal failure. |
-void FatalFailure() { |
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
-// fatal failures. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- FatalFailure(); |
- FatalFailure(); |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal |
-// failure. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
-// tested returns. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- return; |
- }, ""); |
-} |
- |
-#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
- |
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
-// tested throws. |
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
- try { |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
- throw 0; |
- }, ""); |
- } catch(int) { // NOLINT |
- } |
-} |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
- |
-// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. |
-#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
- |
-template <typename T> |
-class TypedTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>); |
- |
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { |
- EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); |
-} |
- |
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) { |
- EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
-} |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
- |
-// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests. |
-#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
- |
-template <typename T> |
-class TypedTestP : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP); |
- |
-TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { |
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); |
-} |
- |
-TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) { |
- EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
-} |
- |
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure); |
- |
-typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes; |
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes); |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
- |
-#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
- |
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case |
-// name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
- |
-TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
-} |
- |
-# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
- |
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test |
-// case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
- |
-template <typename T> |
-class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes; |
-TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
- |
-TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
-} |
- |
-# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
- |
-# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
- |
- |
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests |
-// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
- |
-template <typename T> |
-class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
-}; |
- |
-TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest); |
- |
-TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
-} |
- |
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst); |
- |
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
- |
-# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
- |
-// Tests various failure conditions of |
-// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}. |
-class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test { |
- public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2. |
- enum FailureMode { |
- FATAL_FAILURE, |
- NONFATAL_FAILURE |
- }; |
- static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) { |
- if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) { |
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
- } else { |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
- } |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
- // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
- // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal " |
- "failure."); |
- // Wrong message. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure " |
- "expected."); |
-} |
- |
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure."); |
- // Wrong message. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal " |
- "failure."); |
-} |
- |
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
- |
-class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest { |
- protected: |
- static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) { |
- ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL); |
- thread.Join(); |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
- // We only intercept the current thread. |
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE), |
- "Expected fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
- // We only intercept the current thread. |
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
- "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
-typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest; |
- |
-// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from |
-// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD. |
-TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) { |
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
- TestPartResultArray results; |
- { |
- ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter( |
- ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD, |
- &results); |
- AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE); |
- AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE); |
- } |
- // The two failures should not have been intercepted. |
- EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail."; |
-} |
- |
-#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
- |
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
- // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
- // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
- "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
- // Wrong message. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
- "Some other fatal failure expected."); |
-} |
- |
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal " |
- "failure."); |
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
- "Expected fatal failure."); |
- // Wrong message. |
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
- "Some other non-fatal failure."); |
-} |
- |
- |
-// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(). |
- |
-class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
- public: |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
- } |
- |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
- public: |
- virtual void SetUp() { |
- printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
- } |
- |
- virtual void TearDown() { |
- printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
- } |
-}; |
- |
-bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false; |
- |
-// The main function. |
-// |
-// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some |
-// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results |
-// with the "golden" file. |
-int main(int argc, char **argv) { |
- testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; |
- |
- // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail. |
- // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of |
- // this program with the golden file. |
- |
- // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many |
- // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test |
- // for it. |
- testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); |
- if (argc >= 2 && |
- String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests") |
- GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true; |
- |
-#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
- if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") { |
- // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child |
- // process of an threadsafe-style death test. |
-# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
- posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout); |
-# else |
- posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout); |
-# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
- } |
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
- |
- if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests)) |
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
- |
- // Registers two global test environments. |
- // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they |
- // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order. |
- testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); |
- testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment); |
- |
- return RunAllTests(); |
-} |