| Index: source/libvpx/third_party/googletest/src/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- source/libvpx/third_party/googletest/src/test/gtest_output_test_.cc (revision 232233)
|
| +++ source/libvpx/third_party/googletest/src/test/gtest_output_test_.cc (working copy)
|
| @@ -1,1020 +0,0 @@
|
| -// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
|
| -// All rights reserved.
|
| -//
|
| -// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
| -// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
|
| -// met:
|
| -//
|
| -// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
| -// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
| -// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
|
| -// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
|
| -// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
|
| -// distribution.
|
| -// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
|
| -// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
|
| -// this software without specific prior written permission.
|
| -//
|
| -// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
| -// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
| -// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
|
| -// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
|
| -// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
|
| -// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
| -// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
|
| -// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
|
| -// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
| -// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
|
| -// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
| -//
|
| -// A unit test for Google Test itself. This verifies that the basic
|
| -// constructs of Google Test work.
|
| -//
|
| -// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
|
| -
|
| -#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
|
| -#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
| -
|
| -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
|
| -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
|
| -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to
|
| -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
|
| -// his code.
|
| -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1
|
| -#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
|
| -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_
|
| -
|
| -#include <stdlib.h>
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
|
| -using testing::TestPartResultArray;
|
| -
|
| -using testing::internal::Notification;
|
| -using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
|
| -#endif
|
| -
|
| -namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
|
| -using testing::internal::String;
|
| -using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
|
| -
|
| -// Tests catching fatal failures.
|
| -
|
| -// A subroutine used by the following test.
|
| -void TestEq1(int x) {
|
| - ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
|
| -// generates, and then returns early.
|
| -void TryTestSubroutine() {
|
| - // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
|
| - TestEq1(2);
|
| -
|
| - // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
|
| - //
|
| - // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
|
| - // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
|
| - if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
|
| -
|
| - // If we get here, something is wrong.
|
| - FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
|
| -// failing test summary.
|
| -class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam());
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
|
| -// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
|
| -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams,
|
| - FailingParamTest,
|
| - testing::Values(2));
|
| -
|
| -// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
|
| -TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
|
| -
|
| - TryTestSubroutine();
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
|
| -TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
|
| -
|
| - // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
|
| - TryTestSubroutine();
|
| -
|
| - // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
|
| - //
|
| - // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
|
| - // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
|
| - if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
|
| -
|
| - // If we get here, something is wrong.
|
| - FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
|
| -TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure
|
| - ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed.
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
|
| -TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
|
| - static const int a[4] = {
|
| - 3, 9, 2, 6
|
| - };
|
| -
|
| - printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
|
| - for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
|
| - printf("i == %d\n", i);
|
| - EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
|
| -
|
| -// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
|
| -void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
|
| - ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
|
| -void SubWithTrace(int n) {
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
|
| -
|
| - SubWithoutTrace(n);
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
|
| -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
|
| - printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
| -
|
| - // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
|
| -
|
| - {
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
|
| - // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
|
| - // the trace.
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
|
| - // should be no trace again.
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
|
| -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
|
| - printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
| -
|
| - for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
|
| -
|
| - SubWithoutTrace(i);
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
|
| -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
|
| - printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
| -
|
| - SubWithTrace(1);
|
| - SubWithTrace(2);
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
|
| -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
|
| - printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
| -
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message.
|
| -
|
| - SubWithTrace(2);
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
|
| -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
|
| - printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
| -
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("A");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
|
| -
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("B");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
|
| -
|
| - {
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("C");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
|
| - << "trace point A, B, and C.";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("D");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
|
| - << "trace point A, B, and D.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
|
| -// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by
|
| -// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
|
| -
|
| -// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
|
| -//
|
| -// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned)
|
| -// ===============================|================================
|
| -// spawns thread B |
|
| -// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
| -// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
|
| -// | generates failure #1
|
| -// | notifies n1
|
| -// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
| -// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2
|
| -// generates failure #2 |
|
| -// notifies n2 |
|
| -// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
| -// waits for n3 | generates failure #3
|
| -// | trace B dies
|
| -// | generates failure #4
|
| -// | notifies n3
|
| -// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
| -// generates failure #5 | finishes
|
| -// trace A dies |
|
| -// generates failure #6 |
|
| -// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
| -// waits for thread B to finish |
|
| -
|
| -struct CheckPoints {
|
| - Notification n1;
|
| - Notification n2;
|
| - Notification n3;
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
|
| - {
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
|
| - check_points->n1.Notify();
|
| - check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
|
| -
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
|
| - } // Trace B dies here.
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
|
| - check_points->n3.Notify();
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
|
| - printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
|
| -
|
| - CheckPoints check_points;
|
| - ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace,
|
| - &check_points,
|
| - NULL);
|
| - check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
|
| -
|
| - {
|
| - SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
|
| - check_points.n2.Notify();
|
| - check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
|
| -
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
|
| - } // Trace A dies here.
|
| - ADD_FAILURE()
|
| - << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
|
| - thread.Join();
|
| -}
|
| -#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -
|
| -TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
|
| - DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
|
| - // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for
|
| - // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
|
| - // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
|
| - // the test output.
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
|
| -//
|
| -// This function creates two failures intentionally.
|
| -void AdHocTest() {
|
| - printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
|
| - EXPECT_TRUE(false);
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
|
| -int RunAllTests() {
|
| - AdHocTest();
|
| - return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
|
| -class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
|
| - protected:
|
| - NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
| - printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
|
| -class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
|
| - protected:
|
| - FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
| - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
| - Init();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). "
|
| - << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
| - << "had a fatal failure.";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). "
|
| - << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
| - << "had a fatal failure.";
|
| - }
|
| - private:
|
| - void Init() {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. "
|
| - << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
| - << "had a fatal failure.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
|
| -class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
|
| - protected:
|
| - virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
|
| - Deinit();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
|
| - }
|
| - private:
|
| - void Deinit() {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
|
| -class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
|
| - protected:
|
| - virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
|
| - Deinit();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
|
| - }
|
| - private:
|
| - void Deinit() {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
|
| - FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. "
|
| - << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -
|
| -// A unary function that may die.
|
| -void DieIf(bool should_die) {
|
| - GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf().";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context.
|
| -
|
| -// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread.
|
| -struct SpawnThreadNotifications {
|
| - SpawnThreadNotifications() {}
|
| -
|
| - Notification spawn_thread_started;
|
| - Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate;
|
| -
|
| - private:
|
| - GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications);
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the
|
| -// MultipleThreads test (below).
|
| -static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) {
|
| - // Signals the main thread that this thread has started.
|
| - notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify();
|
| -
|
| - // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread.
|
| - notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification();
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest
|
| -// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later
|
| -// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests.
|
| -class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test {
|
| - protected:
|
| - // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin.
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>(
|
| - &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL));
|
| - notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification();
|
| - }
|
| - // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it.
|
| - // Depending on the version of the thread library in use,
|
| - // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere
|
| - // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class
|
| - // cleans up after itself as best it can.
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify();
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - private:
|
| - SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_;
|
| - scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_;
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -
|
| -// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
|
| -// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
|
| -// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture
|
| -// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
|
| -
|
| -// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
|
| -// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
|
| -// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
|
| -// fail.
|
| -
|
| -namespace foo {
|
| -
|
| -class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
|
| -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
|
| -
|
| -class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
|
| - TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
|
| -
|
| -} // namespace foo
|
| -
|
| -namespace bar {
|
| -
|
| -class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the
|
| -// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
|
| -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
|
| -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
|
| -
|
| -class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
| -// generates the right error message.
|
| -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
|
| - TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
|
| -
|
| -} // namespace bar
|
| -
|
| -// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
|
| -// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first
|
| -// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
|
| -// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
|
| -
|
| -class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
|
| -
|
| -// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
| -// generates the right error message.
|
| -TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
|
| -
|
| -class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
|
| -
|
| -// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
| -// generates the right error message.
|
| -TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
|
| -int global_integer = 0;
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
|
| - global_integer = 0;
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
|
| -// (static or not).
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
|
| - int m = 0;
|
| - static int n;
|
| - n = 1;
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
|
| -// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
|
| -// non-fatal failure.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
|
| -// non-fatal failures.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
|
| -// failure.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
| -// tested returns.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - return;
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
| -// tested throws.
|
| -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - try {
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - throw 0;
|
| - }, "");
|
| - } catch(int) { // NOLINT
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
|
| - global_integer = 0;
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
|
| -// variables.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
|
| - static int n;
|
| - n = 1;
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
|
| -// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
|
| -// failure.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
|
| -void FatalFailure() {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
|
| -// fatal failures.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - FatalFailure();
|
| - FatalFailure();
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
|
| -// failure.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
| -// tested returns.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - return;
|
| - }, "");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
| -// tested throws.
|
| -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
|
| - printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
| - try {
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
| - throw 0;
|
| - }, "");
|
| - } catch(int) { // NOLINT
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
| -
|
| -// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests.
|
| -#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
| -
|
| -template <typename T>
|
| -class TypedTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam());
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
| -
|
| -// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests.
|
| -#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
| -
|
| -template <typename T>
|
| -class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP);
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam());
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
|
| -
|
| -typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
|
| -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
| -
|
| -// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
|
| -// name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
| -
|
| -TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
| -
|
| -// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
|
| -// case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
| -
|
| -template <typename T>
|
| -class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
|
| -TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
| -
|
| -# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
|
| -// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
| -
|
| -template <typename T>
|
| -class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
|
| -
|
| -TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
|
| -
|
| -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
|
| -
|
| -# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
| -
|
| -// Tests various failure conditions of
|
| -// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
|
| -class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
|
| - public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
|
| - enum FailureMode {
|
| - FATAL_FAILURE,
|
| - NONFATAL_FAILURE
|
| - };
|
| - static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
|
| - if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| - } else {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
| - }
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
|
| - // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| - // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal "
|
| - "failure.");
|
| - // Wrong message.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure "
|
| - "expected.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
| - // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
| - // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| - // Wrong message.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal "
|
| - "failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -
|
| -class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
|
| - protected:
|
| - static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
|
| - ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL);
|
| - thread.Join();
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
|
| - // We only intercept the current thread.
|
| - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
| - "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
| - // We only intercept the current thread.
|
| - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
| - "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
|
| -
|
| -// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
|
| -// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
|
| -TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
|
| - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
| - TestPartResultArray results;
|
| - {
|
| - ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
|
| - ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
|
| - &results);
|
| - AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
|
| - AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
|
| - }
|
| - // The two failures should not have been intercepted.
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
| - // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| - // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
| - "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
| - // Wrong message.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
| - "Some other fatal failure expected.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
| - // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal "
|
| - "failure.");
|
| - // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
| - "Expected fatal failure.");
|
| - // Wrong message.
|
| - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
| - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
| - "Some other non-fatal failure.");
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
|
| -
|
| -class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
| - public:
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
|
| - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
| - public:
|
| - virtual void SetUp() {
|
| - printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - virtual void TearDown() {
|
| - printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
| - }
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false;
|
| -
|
| -// The main function.
|
| -//
|
| -// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
|
| -// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
|
| -// with the "golden" file.
|
| -int main(int argc, char **argv) {
|
| - testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false;
|
| -
|
| - // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
|
| - // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
|
| - // this program with the golden file.
|
| -
|
| - // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
|
| - // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test
|
| - // for it.
|
| - testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
|
| - if (argc >= 2 &&
|
| - String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")
|
| - GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true;
|
| -
|
| -#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
| - if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
|
| - // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
|
| - // process of an threadsafe-style death test.
|
| -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
| - posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
|
| -# else
|
| - posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
|
| -# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
| - return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
| - }
|
| -#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
| -
|
| - if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests))
|
| - return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
| -
|
| - // Registers two global test environments.
|
| - // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
|
| - // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
|
| - testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
|
| - testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
|
| -
|
| - return RunAllTests();
|
| -}
|
|
|