Fixing broken images

gm/rebaseline_server/imagepair_test.py

Index: gm/rebaseline_server/imagepair_test.py
diff --git a/gm/rebaseline_server/imagepair_test.py b/gm/rebaseline_server/imagepair_test.py
index 5a9f42484834818750475861076a0235a1d8606c..24eeb93025cf934215e507f2430ee2f1539d2d12 100755
--- a/gm/rebaseline_server/imagepair_test.py
+++ b/gm/rebaseline_server/imagepair_test.py
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ class ImagePairTest(unittest.TestCase):
                     'numDifferingPixels': 662,
                     'percentDifferingPixels': 0.0662,
                     'perceptualDifference': 0.06620300000000157,
+                    'diffUrl': 'arcofzorro_16206093933823793653_png_png-vs-arcofzorro_13786535001616823825_png_png.png',
+                    'whiteDiffUrl': 'arcofzorro_16206093933823793653_png_png-vs-arcofzorro_13786535001616823825_png_png.png',

[epoger, 2014/08/14 18:06:35]

Maybe in a followup CL, we could replace the repeated "_png_png" with just
"_png".  No need to do it now.

[stephana, 2014/08/14 18:28:22]

Agreed. The repeated 'png' actually broke the front-end in the first place, but
if we fix it on the backend it will automatically show up in the front-end. I'll
do a follow up CL. 
http://skbug.com/2835

                 },
                 'imageAUrl': 'arcofzorro/16206093933823793653.png',
                 'imageBUrl': 'arcofzorro/13786535001616823825.png',
@@ -115,6 +117,8 @@ class ImagePairTest(unittest.TestCase):
                     'numDifferingPixels': 102400,
                     'percentDifferingPixels': 100.00,
                     'perceptualDifference': 100.00,
+                    'diffUrl': 'gradients_degenerate_2pt_10552995703607727960_png_png-vs-gradients_degenerate_2pt_11198253335583713230_png_png.png',
+                    'whiteDiffUrl': 'gradients_degenerate_2pt_10552995703607727960_png_png-vs-gradients_degenerate_2pt_11198253335583713230_png_png.png'
                 },
                 'expectations': {
                     'bugs': [1001, 1002],