Index: Source/core/editing/SpellChecker.cpp |
diff --git a/Source/core/editing/SpellChecker.cpp b/Source/core/editing/SpellChecker.cpp |
index fb57b8b84a4eb81d8e87258c962b7c053072a98d..c1180918d77fa3b534d11e9b172e59a655e66060 100644 |
--- a/Source/core/editing/SpellChecker.cpp |
+++ b/Source/core/editing/SpellChecker.cpp |
@@ -824,6 +824,27 @@ void SpellChecker::removeSpellingMarkers() |
m_frame.document()->markers().removeMarkers(DocumentMarker::MisspellingMarkers()); |
} |
+void SpellChecker::removeSpellingMarkersUnderWords(const Vector<String> &words) |
+{ |
groby-ooo-7-16
2014/07/30 21:13:27
You might want to test this for large documents. I
Klemen Forstnerič
2014/07/31 17:14:00
Could you point out which piece of code was shown
groby-ooo-7-16
2014/08/01 00:13:22
The bottleneck for checking was the IPC traffic. Y
Klemen Forstnerič
2014/08/01 21:58:17
Seems to work fast enough. :-)
|
+ auto document = m_frame.document(); |
+ auto& markerController = document->markers(); |
+ |
+ auto markerNodePairs = markerController.markerNodePairs(); |
+ for (const auto &markerNodePair: markerNodePairs) { |
+ auto node = const_cast<Node *>(markerNodePair.first.get()); |
+ auto marker = markerNodePair.second; |
+ |
+ auto markerRange = Range::create(*document, |
+ node, marker->startOffset(), |
+ node, marker->endOffset()); |
+ |
+ if (words.contains(markerRange->text())) |
+ markerController.removeMarkers(markerRange.get()); |
+ } |
+ |
+ markerController.repaintMarkers(); |
+} |
+ |
void SpellChecker::spellCheckAfterBlur() |
{ |
if (!m_frame.selection().selection().isContentEditable()) |