Run nanobench on perf bots.

Run nanobench on perf bots.

We have a new harness, "nanobench", for our microbenchmarks that we trust more than the old "bench".  I figure it's time to get the bots running it.

Plan:
  1) land this
  2) see what bots if any needs special consideration; fix them
  3) update upload_bench_results.py to look for nanobench_ files instead of microbench_ files.
  4) clean up RunBench

BUG=skia:

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/0e977d0753ecc81fd4e45e088ebc5bc16f0b4b75

[borenet, 2014-07-14 19:48:25]

LGTM if the master/slave combo works on your machine.

https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/master/skia_master_scrip...
File master/skia_master_scripts/factory.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/master/skia_master_scrip...
master/skia_master_scripts/factory.py:725: self.RunNanobench()
Is nanobench part of the "most" build target?  If not, we'll need to add it to
the list of build targets.

[mtklein, 2014-07-14 19:52:11]

https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/master/skia_master_scrip...
File master/skia_master_scripts/factory.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/master/skia_master_scrip...
master/skia_master_scripts/factory.py:725: self.RunNanobench()
On 2014/07/14 19:48:25, borenet wrote:
> Is nanobench part of the "most" build target?  If not, we'll need to add it to
> the list of build targets.

Yup.  most builds bench.gyp:*, which covers nanobench.

[borenet, 2014-07-14 19:55:01]

https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/slave/skia_slave_scripts...
File slave/skia_slave_scripts/run_nanobench.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/slave/skia_slave_scripts...
slave/skia_slave_scripts/run_nanobench.py:1: #!/usr/bin/env python
Same comment as in https://codereview.chromium.org/395443002:

We'll also need to add 'nanobench' to the list in
https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/slave/skia_slave_scripts/flav...,
line 97.

[mtklein, 2014-07-14 19:58:28]

On 2014/07/14 19:55:01, borenet wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/slave/skia_slave_scripts...
> File slave/skia_slave_scripts/run_nanobench.py (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/393593003/diff/20001/slave/skia_slave_scripts...
> slave/skia_slave_scripts/run_nanobench.py:1: #!/usr/bin/env python
> Same comment as in https://codereview.chromium.org/395443002:
> 
> We'll also need to add 'nanobench' to the list in
>
https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/slave/skia_slave_scripts/flav...,
> line 97.

Done.

[mtklein, 2014-07-14 20:16:00]

The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-07-14 20:16:22]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/393593003/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-07-14 20:17:16]

Change committed as 0e977d0753ecc81fd4e45e088ebc5bc16f0b4b75