Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1125)

Unified Diff: mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h

Issue 392783006: Mojo: Split public/cpp/system/core.h into pieces (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/public/cpp/system/core.h ('k') | mojo/public/cpp/system/functions.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h
diff --git a/mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h b/mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37120666a1152de4f89be99d9b84cf259c4cfbe5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#ifndef MOJO_PUBLIC_CPP_SYSTEM_DATA_PIPE_H_
+#define MOJO_PUBLIC_CPP_SYSTEM_DATA_PIPE_H_
+
+#include <assert.h>
+
+#include "mojo/public/c/system/data_pipe.h"
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/system/handle.h"
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/system/macros.h"
+
+namespace mojo {
+
+// DataPipeProducerHandle and DataPipeConsumerHandle ---------------------------
+
+class DataPipeProducerHandle : public Handle {
+ public:
+ DataPipeProducerHandle() {}
+ explicit DataPipeProducerHandle(MojoHandle value) : Handle(value) {}
+
+ // Copying and assignment allowed.
+};
+
+MOJO_COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(DataPipeProducerHandle) == sizeof(Handle),
+ bad_size_for_cpp_DataPipeProducerHandle);
+
+typedef ScopedHandleBase<DataPipeProducerHandle> ScopedDataPipeProducerHandle;
+MOJO_COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(ScopedDataPipeProducerHandle) ==
+ sizeof(DataPipeProducerHandle),
+ bad_size_for_cpp_ScopedDataPipeProducerHandle);
+
+class DataPipeConsumerHandle : public Handle {
+ public:
+ DataPipeConsumerHandle() {}
+ explicit DataPipeConsumerHandle(MojoHandle value) : Handle(value) {}
+
+ // Copying and assignment allowed.
+};
+
+MOJO_COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(DataPipeConsumerHandle) == sizeof(Handle),
+ bad_size_for_cpp_DataPipeConsumerHandle);
+
+typedef ScopedHandleBase<DataPipeConsumerHandle> ScopedDataPipeConsumerHandle;
+MOJO_COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(ScopedDataPipeConsumerHandle) ==
+ sizeof(DataPipeConsumerHandle),
+ bad_size_for_cpp_ScopedDataPipeConsumerHandle);
+
+inline MojoResult CreateDataPipe(
+ const MojoCreateDataPipeOptions* options,
+ ScopedDataPipeProducerHandle* data_pipe_producer,
+ ScopedDataPipeConsumerHandle* data_pipe_consumer) {
+ assert(data_pipe_producer);
+ assert(data_pipe_consumer);
+ DataPipeProducerHandle producer_handle;
+ DataPipeConsumerHandle consumer_handle;
+ MojoResult rv = MojoCreateDataPipe(options, producer_handle.mutable_value(),
+ consumer_handle.mutable_value());
+ // Reset even on failure (reduces the chances that a "stale"/incorrect handle
+ // will be used).
+ data_pipe_producer->reset(producer_handle);
+ data_pipe_consumer->reset(consumer_handle);
+ return rv;
+}
+
+inline MojoResult WriteDataRaw(DataPipeProducerHandle data_pipe_producer,
+ const void* elements,
+ uint32_t* num_bytes,
+ MojoWriteDataFlags flags) {
+ return MojoWriteData(data_pipe_producer.value(), elements, num_bytes, flags);
+}
+
+inline MojoResult BeginWriteDataRaw(DataPipeProducerHandle data_pipe_producer,
+ void** buffer,
+ uint32_t* buffer_num_bytes,
+ MojoWriteDataFlags flags) {
+ return MojoBeginWriteData(data_pipe_producer.value(), buffer,
+ buffer_num_bytes, flags);
+}
+
+inline MojoResult EndWriteDataRaw(DataPipeProducerHandle data_pipe_producer,
+ uint32_t num_bytes_written) {
+ return MojoEndWriteData(data_pipe_producer.value(), num_bytes_written);
+}
+
+inline MojoResult ReadDataRaw(DataPipeConsumerHandle data_pipe_consumer,
+ void* elements,
+ uint32_t* num_bytes,
+ MojoReadDataFlags flags) {
+ return MojoReadData(data_pipe_consumer.value(), elements, num_bytes, flags);
+}
+
+inline MojoResult BeginReadDataRaw(DataPipeConsumerHandle data_pipe_consumer,
+ const void** buffer,
+ uint32_t* buffer_num_bytes,
+ MojoReadDataFlags flags) {
+ return MojoBeginReadData(data_pipe_consumer.value(), buffer, buffer_num_bytes,
+ flags);
+}
+
+inline MojoResult EndReadDataRaw(DataPipeConsumerHandle data_pipe_consumer,
+ uint32_t num_bytes_read) {
+ return MojoEndReadData(data_pipe_consumer.value(), num_bytes_read);
+}
+
+// A wrapper class that automatically creates a data pipe and owns both handles.
+// TODO(vtl): Make an even more friendly version? (Maybe templatized for a
+// particular type instead of some "element"? Maybe functions that take
+// vectors?)
+class DataPipe {
+ public:
+ DataPipe();
+ explicit DataPipe(const MojoCreateDataPipeOptions& options);
+ ~DataPipe();
+
+ ScopedDataPipeProducerHandle producer_handle;
+ ScopedDataPipeConsumerHandle consumer_handle;
+};
+
+inline DataPipe::DataPipe() {
+ MojoResult result MOJO_ALLOW_UNUSED =
+ CreateDataPipe(NULL, &producer_handle, &consumer_handle);
+ assert(result == MOJO_RESULT_OK);
+}
+
+inline DataPipe::DataPipe(const MojoCreateDataPipeOptions& options) {
+ MojoResult result MOJO_ALLOW_UNUSED =
+ CreateDataPipe(&options, &producer_handle, &consumer_handle);
+ assert(result == MOJO_RESULT_OK);
+}
+
+inline DataPipe::~DataPipe() {
+}
+
+} // namespace mojo
+
+#endif // MOJO_PUBLIC_CPP_SYSTEM_DATA_PIPE_H_
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/public/cpp/system/core.h ('k') | mojo/public/cpp/system/functions.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698