Get rid of the rest of CreateStringValue

components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc

Index: components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
diff --git a/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc b/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
index 36c9c2a485440f60b6eb577c34a22b972a528f25..db30b0f1c51ae301ddd95ec9e23bae71f67957ee 100644
--- a/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
+++ b/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
@@ -79,9 +79,11 @@ TEST(StringToIntEnumListPolicyHandlerTest, CheckPolicySettings) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.GetErrors(kTestPolicy).empty());
 
-  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+                 POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
                  POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
-                 base::Value::CreateStringValue("no list"), NULL);
+                 new base::StringValue("no list"),
+                 NULL);
   errors.Clear();
   EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -180,8 +182,10 @@ TEST(IntRangePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsClamp) {
   // Check that an entirely invalid value is rejected and yields an error
   // message.
   policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
-                 POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY, POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
-                 base::Value::CreateStringValue("invalid"), NULL);
+                 POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+                 POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+                 new base::StringValue("invalid"),
+                 NULL);
   errors.Clear();
   EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -245,8 +249,11 @@ TEST(IntRangePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsDontClamp) {
 
   // Check that an entirely invalid value is rejected and yields an error
   // message.
-  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY, POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
-                 base::Value::CreateStringValue("invalid"), NULL);
+  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+                 POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+                 POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+                 new base::StringValue("invalid"),
+                 NULL);
   errors.Clear();
   EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -425,8 +432,11 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsClamp) {
 
   // Check that an entirely invalid value is rejected and yields an error
   // message.
-  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY, POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
-                 base::Value::CreateStringValue("invalid"), NULL);
+  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+                 POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+                 POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+                 new base::StringValue("invalid"),
+                 NULL);
   errors.Clear();
   EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -491,8 +501,11 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsDontClamp) {
 
   // Check that an entirely invalid value is rejected and yields an error
   // message.
-  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY, POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
-                 base::Value::CreateStringValue("invalid"), NULL);
+  policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+                 POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+                 POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+                 new base::StringValue("invalid"),
+                 NULL);
   errors.Clear();
   EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
   EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());