Extending supported sample rate from 3.0KHz to 192.0KHz for OfflineAudioContext.

LayoutTests/webaudio/offlineaudiocontext-constructor.html

Index: LayoutTests/webaudio/offlineaudiocontext-constructor.html
diff --git a/LayoutTests/webaudio/offlineaudiocontext-constructor.html b/LayoutTests/webaudio/offlineaudiocontext-constructor.html
index a3d3f7147b7abdb0dc32385014e437cfa8e5aa87..a406e286c532d73da36e11f1c70b41c0a02003b6 100644
--- a/LayoutTests/webaudio/offlineaudiocontext-constructor.html
+++ b/LayoutTests/webaudio/offlineaudiocontext-constructor.html
@@ -10,6 +10,17 @@ description("Tests the OfflineAudioContext constructor");
 
 // Make sure we don't crash when giving 0 as number of frames.
 shouldThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(1, 0, 44100)");
+// Make sure throwing exception about out of sample rate range.
+shouldThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 4000)");
+shouldThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 98000)");

[Raymond Toy, 2014/07/30 16:49:38]

Aren't these two tests already covered in dom-exceptions? Unless you
specifically want to test 4000 and 98000, I would just use the ones from
dom-exceptions.

[KhNo, 2014/07/31 16:45:53]

Yes, it can be replaced. I think it doesn't need to test duplicately.

+// Make sure we don't throw exception supported ranges of sample rate.
+shouldNotThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 8000)");
+shouldNotThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 11025)");
+shouldNotThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 22050)");
+shouldNotThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 44100)");
+shouldNotThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 88200)");
+shouldNotThrow("new OfflineAudioContext(2, 512, 96000)");

[Raymond Toy, 2014/07/30 16:49:38]

Might as well add a test for 48000, which is another very common sample rate.

[KhNo, 2014/07/31 16:45:53]

I agree with you, if there are famous values should be added.

[Raymond Toy, 2014/07/31 17:25:13]

Just 48000 is enough for me.

+
 </script>
 </body>
 </html>