Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(102)

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/service-worker-gc.html

Issue 330173003: Make ServiceWorker an ActiveDOMObject (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk
Patch Set: fix hasPendingActivity Created 6 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/service-worker-gc.html
diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/service-worker-gc.html b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/service-worker-gc.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e924445b1151985d18a4897c07d5ab7b310baa97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/service-worker-gc.html
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<script src="../resources/testharness.js"></script>
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/06/12 22:23:38 This should use the Blink test harness. GC is an i
falken 2014/06/13 19:22:59 Done.
+<script src="../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
+<script src="resources/test-helpers.js"></script>
+<script src="resources/gc.js"></script>
+<body>
+<script>
+(function() {
+ var t = async_test('A registered Service Worker with an event handler is not garbage collected');
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/06/12 22:23:38 FYI I have started doing async_test(function(t) {
+ var worker = 'resources/empty-worker.js'
+ var scope = 'gc';
+ var swObservation = null;
+ service_worker_unregister_and_register(t, worker, scope, onRegister);
+
+ function collectGarbage(shouldBeCollected, description) {
+ gc();
+ if (swObservation)
+ assert_equals(swObservation.wasCollected, shouldBeCollected, description);
+ }
+
+ function onUnregister() {
+ // FIXME: The expectation should be reversed, but our implementation currently fails it.
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/06/12 22:23:38 I think you want to rephrase this as a "leak test"
falken 2014/06/13 19:22:59 OK, the idea being that the test would succeed on
+ // When properly implemented, the SW should be garbage collected here.
+ t.step(collectGarbage.bind(undefined, false, 'Service Worker should be gc\'d after unregistration'));
+ t.done();
+ }
+
+ function onRegister(sw) {
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/06/12 22:23:38 FYI I am moving to using promises instead of callb
falken 2014/06/13 19:22:59 Done. Yes, I think that's a good idea. Our test-he
+ sw.addEventListener('statechange', t.step_func(onStateChange));
+ if (window.internals)
+ swObservation = internals.observeGC(sw);
+ setTimeout(t.step_func(collectGarbage.bind(undefined, false, 'Service Worker should not be gc\'d after registration')), 0);
+ }
+
+ function onStateChange(event) {
+ t.step(collectGarbage.bind(undefined, false, 'Service Worker should not be gc\'d inside onStateChange handler'));
+ if (event.target.state != 'active')
+ return;
+ navigator.serviceWorker.unregister(scope).then(t.step_func(onUnregister));
+ }
+}());
+</script>
+</body>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698