Chromium Code Reviews| Index: cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc b/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc |
| index 8db2b9567c4ec679ebd77751b54fdcd326c7d3ec..2b0bd875bf6fc96609016f625f5f6fdb73d3c6ff 100644 |
| --- a/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc |
| @@ -1117,6 +1117,78 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingForMultipleLayersAtVaryingDepths) { |
| EXPECT_EQ(4, result_layer->id()); |
| } |
| +TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingNotDrawnClippedLayersWithHandlers) { |
| + scoped_ptr<LayerImpl> root = LayerImpl::Create(host_impl().active_tree(), 1); |
| + gfx::Transform identity_matrix; |
| + gfx::Point3F transform_origin; |
| + gfx::PointF position; |
| + gfx::Size bounds(100, 100); |
| + SetLayerPropertiesForTesting(root.get(), |
| + identity_matrix, |
| + transform_origin, |
| + position, |
| + bounds, |
| + true, |
| + false); |
| + root->SetDrawsContent(true); |
| + { |
| + scoped_ptr<LayerImpl> child1 = |
| + LayerImpl::Create(host_impl().active_tree(), 2); |
| + scoped_ptr<LayerImpl> grand_child1 = |
| + LayerImpl::Create(host_impl().active_tree(), 4); |
| + |
| + position = gfx::PointF(10.f, 10.f); |
| + bounds = gfx::Size(50, 50); |
| + SetLayerPropertiesForTesting(child1.get(), |
| + identity_matrix, |
| + transform_origin, |
| + position, |
| + bounds, |
| + true, |
| + false); |
| + child1->SetDrawsContent(true); |
| + child1->SetMasksToBounds(true); |
| + |
| + position = gfx::PointF(0.f, 40.f); |
| + bounds = gfx::Size(100, 50); |
| + SetLayerPropertiesForTesting(grand_child1.get(), |
| + identity_matrix, |
| + transform_origin, |
| + position, |
| + bounds, |
| + true, |
| + false); |
| + grand_child1->SetDrawsContent(true); |
| + grand_child1->SetForceRenderSurface(true); |
| + |
| + child1->AddChild(grand_child1.Pass()); |
| + root->AddChild(child1.Pass()); |
| + } |
| + |
| + LayerImpl* child1 = root->children()[0]; |
| + LayerImpl* grand_child1 = child1->children()[0]; |
| + |
| + child1->SetTouchEventHandlerRegion(gfx::Rect(0, 0, 50, 50)); |
| + grand_child1->SetTouchEventHandlerRegion(gfx::Rect(0, 0, 50, 50)); |
| + |
| + host_impl().SetViewportSize(root->bounds()); |
| + host_impl().active_tree()->SetRootLayer(root.Pass()); |
| + host_impl().active_tree()->UpdateDrawProperties(); |
| + |
| + // This is meant to simulate the destruction of the render target. In |
| + // reality this would leave a stale pointer, but to ensure that the test |
| + // crashes without the appropriate guards, we force it to be NULL here. |
| + child1->draw_properties().render_target = NULL; |
| + child1->SetHideLayerAndSubtree(true); |
| + host_impl().active_tree()->UpdateDrawProperties(); |
| + |
| + gfx::Point test_point = gfx::Point(11, 51); |
| + LayerImpl* result_layer = |
| + host_impl().active_tree()->FindLayerThatIsHitByPoint(test_point); |
| + ASSERT_TRUE(result_layer); |
| + EXPECT_EQ(4, result_layer->id()); |
|
danakj
2014/06/11 22:15:06
Mmh, you're touch-interacting with grandchild1, bu
Ian Vollick
2014/06/11 23:50:37
It is weird, but yeah, it was intentional. We stil
danakj
2014/06/12 00:21:23
Well, hm. Isn't the invariant that you have a vali
|
| +} |
| + |
| TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingForMultipleLayerLists) { |
| // |
| // The geometry is set up similarly to the previous case, but |