Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(932)

Issue 2975903002: Make ProfileURLRequestContexts use their own CTPolicyEnforcer. (Closed)

Created:
3 years, 5 months ago by mmenke
Modified:
3 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers:
Ryan Sleevi, estark
CC:
chromium-reviews
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make ProfileURLRequestContexts use their own CTPolicyEnforcer. This is mostly about making URLRequestContextBuilder creation simpler, so the NetworkService doesn't have to worry about sharing CTPolicyEnforcers between URLRequestContexts. BUG=734199 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2975903002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#485765} Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/0c15ff49e64bda7efc4d6259296f1bcdca64039b

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+3 lines, -3 lines) Patch
M chrome/browser/io_thread.cc View 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 1 comment Download
M chrome/browser/profiles/profile_io_data.cc View 2 chunks +3 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 20 (11 generated)
mmenke
There's no need to share CTPolicyEnforcers between URLRequestContexts, right? I want to make URLRequestContexts more ...
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 17:18:07 UTC) #4
estark
lgtm, but it might be worth a quick sanity-check with sleevi; I'm not sure I ...
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 21:55:19 UTC) #7
mmenke
On 2017/07/11 21:55:19, estark wrote: > lgtm, but it might be worth a quick sanity-check ...
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 21:57:24 UTC) #8
mmenke
[+rsleevi]: PTAL. This isn't too exciting, I'm just trying to reduce sharing of URLRequestContext components ...
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 21:59:16 UTC) #10
Ryan Sleevi
LGTM The only reason is to reduce memory overhead, since all objects implement the same ...
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 22:02:31 UTC) #11
mmenke
On 2017/07/11 22:02:31, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > LGTM > > The only reason is to ...
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 22:06:00 UTC) #12
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at: https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2975903002/1
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 22:07:03 UTC) #14
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at: https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2975903002/1
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-11 23:32:40 UTC) #17
commit-bot: I haz the power
3 years, 5 months ago (2017-07-12 01:26:14 UTC) #20
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/0c15ff49e64bda7efc4d6259296f...

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698