[LayoutNG] Update FlagExpectations for LayoutNG

[LayoutNG] Update FlagExpectations for LayoutNG

BUG=591099
TBR=eae@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_layout_ng

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2865943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#471245}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/e1f4f5e2d1cc9c40e2ab79491606e46d2bc86a90

[kojii, 2017-05-08 07:01:26]

Patchset #1 (id:1) has been deleted

[kojii, 2017-05-09 05:20:45]

Description was changed from

==========
ngbot

BUG=
==========

to

==========
[LayoutNG] Update FlagExpectations for LayoutNG

BUG=591099
TBR=eae@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_layout_ng
==========

[kojii, 2017-05-12 04:54:17]

The CQ bit was checked by kojii@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 04:54:30]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 06:41:14]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 06:41:15]

Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.

[kojii, 2017-05-12 07:54:41]

kojii@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ eae@chromium.org

[kojii, 2017-05-12 07:54:41]

The CQ bit was checked by kojii@chromium.org

[kojii, 2017-05-12 07:54:42]

+300 in a week, and less than 100 crashes-or-timeouts looks not bad ;)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 07:54:59]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 07:57:48]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 100001, "attempt_start_ts": 1494575681959750,
"parent_rev": "2f1f8dd5a7f7d15da2c24fc2ffa27ef48c7441a1", "commit_rev":
"e1f4f5e2d1cc9c40e2ab79491606e46d2bc86a90"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 07:58:03]

Description was changed from

==========
[LayoutNG] Update FlagExpectations for LayoutNG

BUG=591099
TBR=eae@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_layout_ng
==========

to

==========
[LayoutNG] Update FlagExpectations for LayoutNG

BUG=591099
TBR=eae@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_layout_ng

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2865943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#471245}
Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/e1f4f5e2d1cc9c40e2ab79491606...
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-05-12 07:58:04]

Committed patchset #5 (id:100001) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/e1f4f5e2d1cc9c40e2ab79491606...

[eae, 2017-05-12 16:33:24]

LGTM post-facto

The Failure Pass lines, are those for flaky tests or ones that are now passing?

[kojii, 2017-05-12 16:36:05]

On 2017/05/12 at 16:33:24, eae wrote:
> LGTM post-facto
> 
> The Failure Pass lines, are those for flaky tests or ones that are now
passing?

Haven't determined whether they pass now, or still flaky. I updated my script to
find consecutive passes, so I'm planning to run it to find, say, consecutive
passes for a week should be removed by downloading results from the bot.

[eae, 2017-05-12 16:46:31]

Sounds good, thanks!