Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(146)

Issue 2835014: Make the apply.js unit test more resilient to differing stack positions.... (Closed)

Created:
10 years, 6 months ago by zarko
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make the apply.js unit test more resilient to differing stack positions. More information is at http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=742 Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=4918

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : enable test in .status; use booleans in test #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+14 lines, -4 lines) Patch
M test/mjsunit/apply.js View 1 2 chunks +14 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M test/mjsunit/mjsunit.status View 1 chunk +0 lines, -3 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
zarko
I think this change should fix the problem with this test on OS X. (The ...
10 years, 6 months ago (2010-06-21 23:51:10 UTC) #1
Erik Corry
LGTM
10 years, 6 months ago (2010-06-22 10:21:38 UTC) #2
Vitaly Repeshko
LGTM test/mjsunit/mjsunit.status should be updated to enable the test. http://codereview.chromium.org/2835014/diff/1/2 File test/mjsunit/apply.js (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/2835014/diff/1/2#newcode115 test/mjsunit/apply.js:115: ...
10 years, 6 months ago (2010-06-22 12:58:32 UTC) #3
zarko
Just want to make sure that I'm doing this correctly. Thanks Luke http://codereview.chromium.org/2835014/diff/5001/6002 File test/mjsunit/mjsunit.status ...
10 years, 6 months ago (2010-06-22 21:48:20 UTC) #4
Vitaly Repeshko
10 years, 6 months ago (2010-06-22 22:01:46 UTC) #5
http://codereview.chromium.org/2835014/diff/5001/6002
File test/mjsunit/mjsunit.status (left):

http://codereview.chromium.org/2835014/diff/5001/6002#oldcode39
test/mjsunit/mjsunit.status:39: 
On 2010/06/22 21:48:20, zarko wrote:
> Is this sufficient to re-enable the test?

I think so, yes. After submitting you can check status at
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/v8/waterfall. Please also update the bugs.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698