Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(776)

Unified Diff: sync/engine/syncer_util_unittest.cc

Issue 283143002: sync: Improve handling of bad UniquePos (retry) (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « sync/engine/syncer_util.cc ('k') | sync/internal_api/public/base/unique_position.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sync/engine/syncer_util_unittest.cc
diff --git a/sync/engine/syncer_util_unittest.cc b/sync/engine/syncer_util_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eec72eaad313746ed07dff7830a6755c61ee35ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sync/engine/syncer_util_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "sync/engine/syncer_util.h"
+
+#include "base/rand_util.h"
+#include "sync/internal_api/public/base/unique_position.h"
+#include "sync/protocol/sync.pb.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace syncer {
+
+class GetUpdatePositionTest : public ::testing::Test {
+ public:
+ GetUpdatePositionTest() {
+ InitUpdate();
+
+ // Init test_position to some valid position value, but don't assign
+ // it to the update just yet.
+ std::string pos_suffix = UniquePosition::RandomSuffix();
+ test_position = UniquePosition::InitialPosition(pos_suffix);
+ }
+
+ void InitUpdate() {
+ update.set_id_string("I");
+ update.set_parent_id_string("P");
+ update.set_version(10);
+ update.set_mtime(100);
+ update.set_ctime(100);
+ update.set_deleted(false);
+ update.mutable_specifics()->mutable_bookmark()->set_title("Chrome");
+ update.mutable_specifics()->mutable_bookmark()->
+ set_url("https://www.chrome.com");
+ }
+
+ void InitSuffixIngredients() {
+ update.set_originator_cache_guid("CacheGUID");
+ update.set_originator_client_item_id("OrigID");
+ }
+
+ void InitProtoPosition() {
+ test_position.ToProto(update.mutable_unique_position());
+ }
+
+ void InitInt64Position(int64 pos_value) {
+ update.set_position_in_parent(pos_value);
+ }
+
+ sync_pb::SyncEntity update;
+ UniquePosition test_position;
+};
+
+// Generate a suffix from originator client GUID and client-assigned ID. These
+// values should always be present in updates sent down to the client, and
+// combine to create a globally unique value.
+TEST_F(GetUpdatePositionTest, SuffixFromUpdate) {
+ InitSuffixIngredients();
+
+ // Expect suffix is valid and consistent.
+ std::string suffix1 = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+ std::string suffix2 = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(suffix1, suffix2);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(UniquePosition::IsValidSuffix(suffix1));
+}
+
+// Receive an update without the ingredients used to make a consistent suffix.
+//
+// The server should never send us an update like this. If it does,
+// that's a bug and it needs to be fixed. Still, we'd like to not
+// crash and have fairly reasonable results in this scenario.
+TEST_F(GetUpdatePositionTest, SuffixFromRandom) {
+ // Intentonally do not call InitSuffixIngredients()
+
+ // Expect suffix is valid but inconsistent.
+ std::string suffix1 = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+ std::string suffix2 = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+
+ EXPECT_NE(suffix1, suffix2);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(UniquePosition::IsValidSuffix(suffix1));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(UniquePosition::IsValidSuffix(suffix2));
+}
+
+TEST_F(GetUpdatePositionTest, FromInt64) {
+ InitSuffixIngredients();
+ InitInt64Position(10);
+
+ std::string suffix = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+
+ // Expect the result is valid.
+ UniquePosition pos = GetUpdatePosition(update, suffix);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(pos.IsValid());
+
+ // Expect the position had some effect on ordering.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(pos.LessThan(
+ UniquePosition::FromInt64(11, UniquePosition::RandomSuffix())));
+}
+
+TEST_F(GetUpdatePositionTest, FromProto) {
+ InitSuffixIngredients();
+ InitInt64Position(10);
+
+ std::string suffix = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+
+ // The proto position is not set, so we should get one based on the int64.
+ // It should not match the proto we defined in the test harness.
+ UniquePosition int64_pos = GetUpdatePosition(update, suffix);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(int64_pos.Equals(test_position));
+
+ // Move the test harness' position value into the update proto.
+ // Expect that it takes precedence over the int64-based position.
+ InitProtoPosition();
+ UniquePosition pos = GetUpdatePosition(update, suffix);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(pos.Equals(test_position));
+}
+
+TEST_F(GetUpdatePositionTest, FromNothing) {
+ // Init none of the ingredients necessary to make a position.
+ // Verify we still generate a valid position locally.
+
+ std::string suffix = GetUniqueBookmarkTagFromUpdate(update);
+ UniquePosition pos = GetUpdatePosition(update, suffix);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(pos.IsValid());
+}
+
+} // namespace syncer
« no previous file with comments | « sync/engine/syncer_util.cc ('k') | sync/internal_api/public/base/unique_position.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698