Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(28)

Issue 2802463002: Adds feature flag for chrome-proxy-ect header (default off) (Closed)

Created:
3 years, 8 months ago by dougarnett
Modified:
3 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Adds feature flag for chrome-proxy-ect header (default off) BUG=707981

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Fixed couple decls and comments #

Patch Set 3 : Remove about_flags support and got ECT unittest working #

Patch Set 4 : Tweaked the name of the Feature to be more Feature like than Switch like. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+48 lines, -9 lines) Patch
M components/data_reduction_proxy/core/browser/data_reduction_proxy_network_delegate.cc View 1 2 3 4 chunks +10 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M components/data_reduction_proxy/core/browser/data_reduction_proxy_network_delegate_unittest.cc View 1 2 3 10 chunks +26 lines, -8 lines 0 comments Download
M components/data_reduction_proxy/core/common/data_reduction_proxy_features.h View 1 2 3 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M components/data_reduction_proxy/core/common/data_reduction_proxy_features.cc View 1 2 3 1 chunk +9 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 20 (17 generated)
dougarnett
Please take a look at this approach of adding feature flag for ECT header. I ...
3 years, 8 months ago (2017-04-04 21:30:53 UTC) #4
RyanSturm
On 2017/04/04 21:30:53, dougarnett wrote: > Please take a look at this approach of adding ...
3 years, 8 months ago (2017-04-04 21:41:54 UTC) #5
dougarnett
3 years, 8 months ago (2017-04-05 18:55:34 UTC) #8
On 2017/04/04 21:41:54, Ryan Sturm wrote:
> On 2017/04/04 21:30:53, dougarnett wrote:
> > Please take a look at this approach of adding feature flag for ECT header. I
> > still need to fix up tests but wanted to see if I could get agreement from
you
> > two first before spending much effort on that.
> 
> It seems fine. I don't see a great reason to have a flag, but I don't know the
> best way to keep this disabled on 59 and on for 60 without doing this approach
> or ripping out relevant code. It seems like we really only need a command line
> flag (i.e., don't expose this in about flags). I'd recommend splitting all
> relevant tests into ECT flag and non-ECT flag versions though. Bengr, WDYT?

Removed the about_flags and flag_descriptions additions and got ECT unittest
working based on turning on scoped feature.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698